<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MigsAngel @ Oct 4 2008, 08:35 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>have learned the Hopper lesson....and are not willing to take chances to hire talked up riders.....
There is nothing you ever say good about American riders Migs. You hate all of them and never give them credit. What lesson was to be learned from a guy like Hopper that took the pig of the machine Suzuki to a 4th classification? The fact that Suzuki didn't sign Spies should give you a clue as to where this ...... team has it sights. It’s mid pack all the way.
What would posses a team to resign a nice guy who has zero chance in winning a title like Capi? To develop? Ok, fine, sign him to develop then, but not while on the race grid. Or if you do want him to develop, then do so while having a teammate that is potentially gonna take your team somewhere other than the midpack that Vermi is sure to do. While Vermi is getting his ... kicked by Capi (keep in mind Capi was hurt this year and would account for the difference in points); Vermi's hasn't had success that is worthwhile on an inferior machine (despite that wet win). This team had zero commitment to field a championship contending machine. Hopper found this out the hard way by giving them several good youthful years. Kawasaki promised the world and backed it up with a paycheck. Kawasaki has not been able to deliver a great machine, but that is not for lack of trying. Now they have Melandri, another great rider.
Meanwhile, what have Suzuki done in that span of time, they sign the oldest guy who nobody will give a chance realistically to win a title, and he is the better of the two riders! Vermi is as good as Nakano. This is the indication of how committed Suzuki is. They have zero chance next year. Now contrast that with teams who are taking gambles with young riders. At very least they are taking a gamble of either failing or improving, while Suzuki is content in more of the same mid pack sorry ... performances of a manufacture. The start grid almost never sees a Suzuki in the top three before the start of the race. Kawasaki, like them at very least are signing riders who have that potential. Vermi qualled 15th at his home GP! Suzuki is a ....... joke.
And now you want to say teams have learned their lesson over signing an expensive rider like Hopper? Who the hell twisted the arms of Kawasaki to pay him? And this is Hopper’s fault? Kawasaki was willing to improve their combo by hiring a very good rider, problem has been they have not got their bike sorted out. Suzuki have don nothing, zero, to improve. Obviously you admire mediocrity. I have ten times the respect for Kawasaki than Suzuki. They may be failing, but it is clear they are trying! UNLIKE Suzuki who are content on fielding their "development" rider on the racing grid, and their junior rider who can't even best the "old" man on a consistent bases. The failure here is not Hopper, who should be applauded for his move away from a team with questionable commitment, but rather Suzuki, who only have ever won anything by way of a titles thanks to two Americans who were outstanding riders. (Yeah, migs, Americans, you know, the nationality you love to hate).
These fools again had the opportunity to sign a guy who wasn’t much of a mystery as to how he might do in MotoGP (he proved that in his three outstanding wildcards). Spies had steadily improved all his wildcard races, to calumniate in embarrassing the two regular team riders. Suzuki is not poor financially speaking; they are after all a full factory team who only field two bikes. So its not like their resources are spread thin. They had plenty in reserve to make a reasonable offer. Sure perhaps they didn’t want to give the kid 2 mil, but contrast that with the likely performance that Vermi/Capi are going to give them, and the money doesn’t seem so bad. On top of that, just having Spies on the team would have done wonders to the value of sponsorship they could sell on the bike. What better than for an added audience to tune in just for the sake of curiosity of seeing how the AMA champ might fair.
Let me ask you migs, do you really think Capi will be racing in 2010? Do you think Capi will win a title in 2009? So then why even sign the guy, if you could very well do that as a true development rider outside the racing line? I’m not even gonna ask you about Vermi, who has been a total waste of talent. If he doesn’t win a title next year, why keep the guy? On now with the revelation that Kawasaki is fielding a third bike, this should be another indication to you where this brand has its intentions. That is right, while Kawasaki are increasing thier investments into the racing enterprise, Suzuki is shrinking. Why might this be? Perhaps its because Kawasaki want to win. While they are expanding, Suzuki are imploding. Hopkins saw this while he was in the best position to realize where Suzkui was headed.
Let me ask you something, do you know why Supercross/Motocross is a young man's sport? The answer is, because it is necessary for bodies to heal quickly after injury. Its fairly thesame thing in roadracing, accept thre riders bodies don't have quite the same wear and tear in the race as the dirt boys do. The relevance here is that Capi, though a good racer still, is one injury away from mailing in a season. Now, if Suzuki are not aware of this, then their judgement is called into question. If they know this but are still willing to sign him, then their commitment for a championship is called into question. Oh, as far as Vermi; if you want to compare him to Hopper, we can, while on equal equipment Vermi got beat consistently over a season.
Suzuki are stupid, Hopper saw that and left. Suzuki didn’t sign Spies because the ..... Paul Deming didn’t FEEL Ben was nice enough to him. .... Suzuki and Deming and all those sorry ... decisions they make to field filler on the grid. They will continue to be .... and make zero attempts to improve themselves unless they wake up and take a gamble.