<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Austin @ Jul 23 2009, 10:57 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>And I'm sure the Bridgestone and Michelin associations with Rossi had absolutely nothing to do with marketing. Absolutely 100 percent about his development. All that data and success Bridgestone collected with Ducati and Stoner? Throw it out the window, Rossi will make the tires much better. It makes loads of sense...
There was sarcasm involved in my post Austin, sorry… of course it has to do with Marketing too. As much as any Manufacturer keeping a rider for sales increase, specially US. And please don’t kill me for this, but they have more money than most other countries, so they can buy more bikes. And they have a large population that other Countries don’t, so they can buy more bikes for that reason too.
So you are right, development is part of it (with sarcasm in my post making it way too relevant), but Marketing may weight more. In Rossi’s case of course it does.
There was sarcasm involved in my post Austin, sorry… of course it has to do with Marketing too. As much as any Manufacturer keeping a rider for sales increase, specially US. And please don’t kill me for this, but they have more money than most other countries, so they can buy more bikes. And they have a large population that other Countries don’t, so they can buy more bikes for that reason too.
So you are right, development is part of it (with sarcasm in my post making it way too relevant), but Marketing may weight more. In Rossi’s case of course it does.