<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Babelfish @ Oct 26 2009, 01:33 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Nothing wrong in doing exactly what is needed. See race 2 at WSBK for the recipie.
There it is again. Always taking shots at the success of other riders. He won a title, why can't you appreciate it for what it was. Fifth place was cruising, absolutely, but he got the job done and took home the number one plate. Although Rossi wasn't cruising, he wasn't riding out of his head either. Like I said earlier, had he been doing "more than enough," why was he so hesitant in the early laps? He rode smart and he took home the title, I don't understand what more there is to argue about?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Babelfish @ Oct 26 2009, 01:33 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>To pass Lorenzo was also another thing he definatly didn't have to do, plenty of space behind.
True. Although with a visibly quicker pace than Lorenzo, I'd imagine he was more comfortable running in front of, and eventually away, from Lorenzo.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Babelfish @ Oct 26 2009, 01:33 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>In other words he should have blasted away from <u>every one</u> with ease if he just pushed slightly, not?
Not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is if he was doing so much more than he needed to, why was he 20 seconds behind Stoner?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Babelfish @ Oct 26 2009, 01:33 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>As I said in the forst post I agree that he didn't push to the maximum he just did much more than just crusing in.
I never said he did "just enough" or "cruised." I said he did what he needed to do. If you want to get into the semantics of taking X amount of points when Y are necessary to clinch, then that's your business. If so, Hayden did more than enough in 2006 as he had four points to spare. He could have finished Valencia in fourth rather than third. See how much fun nitpicking is?