Schwantz to Ducati?

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Did you read this Dude? It's ....... jibberish. This is some ........ piece written by some ........ Italian "journalist" using ...... Google translater software.

Oh, and Merry Christmas.



i figured the title said it all.
 
Total bollox!



Reading between the lines of the mismashed "English" translation, offered with no tidying whatsoever, Schwantz offers his Suzukis and Hondas at his race school, but is opening it up to you bringing your own bike, whatever the make. Hence the line about "Ducati or BMW or Yamaha or Kawasaki". Presumably you could also bring your MV or Aprilia. As I said it's a bollox title written by some ...... who can't understand the article after running it through Google translate. Journalism? Meh.



BTW, I may have drunk some wine tonight.....
 
“But we motionless we get adequate requests from people who have code X-Y-Z that they unequivocally would like to pierce their bike and float their possess bike, even yet maybe they’ve come to a module before. Now, hopefully, it’ll usually open adult another channel for some some-more revenue, be means to pierce some-more revenue.”





WTF?
 
Every 'news' article on that laughable site looks like it was written by drunken monkeys.



What purpose does dailynewsworldtoday.com serve?
<
 
Sounds about as coherent as most other Schwantz interviews lately.



Schwantz says one unflattering thing about Casey and now the man is banished for life as inchoherent? Hahaha. I know exactly how that feels.
<
 
Hmm? What the f does Stoner have to do with Schwantz's interviews? I just think the guy's interviews and columns have contained a lot of verbal diarrhoea. You're reading things that aren't there, buttercup.
 
Hmm? What the f does Stoner have to do with Schwantz's interviews? I just think the guy's interviews and columns have contained a lot of verbal diarrhoea. You're reading things that aren't there, buttercup.
 
Found the original.



http://www.cyclenews...antz-to-ducati/



BROOKLYN, NY, DEC 17 - The Schwantz School will celebrate its 12th year in 2012, but with a radical and welcome change; students now have the choice of riding the school's Suzukis and Hondas or their own motorcycles.



The change was made after years of students asking if they could bring their own bikes, whether Honda or Suzuki or any other brand. Now, starting with the first school of 2012 on April 16-17 at Road Atlanta, where the school is returning after three years at Barber Motorsports Park, students who want to ride their own Ducati or BMW or Yamaha or Kawasaki can do so.



This is new! The unbelievably lame site, dailynewsworldtoday, seems to do nothing more than steal real journalists' stories, run them through the mutagenic translator a few times, then re-post the fragmented spew under their own name and call it 'news.' This is lower than whale .... on the sea floor.



BROOKLYN, NY, DEC 17 – The Schwantz School will applaud a 12th year in 2012, yet with a radical and acquire change; students now have a choice of roving a school’s Suzukis and Hondas or their possess motorcycles.



The change was finished after years of students seeking if they could pierce their possess bikes, either Honda or Suzuki or any other brand. Now, starting with a initial propagandize of 2012 on Apr 16-17 during Road Atlanta, where a propagandize is returning after 3 years during Barber Motorsports Park, students who wish to float their possess Ducati or BMW or Yamaha or Kawasaki can do so.



W.T.F. ???
 
Found the original.



http://www.cyclenews...antz-to-ducati/







This is new! The unbelievably lame site, dailynewsworldtoday, seems to do nothing more than steal real journalists' stories, run them through the mutagenic translator a few times, then re-post the fragmented spew under their own name and call it 'news.' This is lower than whale .... on the sea floor.







W.T.F. ???



Discoverd the first.



That are novel! The inconceivable crippled place, everydaynovelglobethisday, appears to act nothing increased but misappropriate actual reporters' tales, fast moving on foot those between a mutagenic decoder the number of courses, subsequently again-pole a splintered vomit beneath their peculiar brand as a consequence refer to this as 'novel'. That exists below narwal excrements upon the bottom of the ocean.



W.A.I !!!
 
well, what they want to achieve is web traffic. obviously, it seems to work out quite well, thanks to idiots like us who read and share that bs instead of ignoring it. (although it makes quite an interesting read, rhetoric-wise, after having had some beers
<
).



cheers,

sewarion
 
Hmm? What the f does Stoner have to do with Schwantz's interviews? I just think the guy's interviews and columns have contained a lot of verbal diarrhoea. You're reading things that aren't there, buttercup.



It has noting to do with Stoner. Thats my point.



It doesnt take much to make ur banish list. And now u dont even remember why you banished him. Typical.
 
It has noting to do with Stoner. Thats my point.



It doesnt take much to make ur banish list. And now u dont even remember why you banished him. Typical.



Ok. since you're acting as my all knowing conscious, tell me why Schwantz made my "banish list". Better yet, show me.



I always try to be forthcoming when I believe my support for a particular rider, mostly Stoner, affect my views. Look back through my posts, if you like, you'll often find disclaimers of such kind when I think they are appropriate.



That does not mean that every opinion I have about this sport is related to me being a fan of a rider. To be honest, it kills off any discussion to consantly assume that they are. Think of how easy it would be to turn that tactic around on you: 'you're against prototypes because Hayden cannot develope a bike', 'you're against Honda because they ...... Hayden', 'you're against fuel limits because Hayden is too fat'[sup]1[/sup]. How long before that becomes old?







[sup]1[/sup]no, I do not really claim these things, I'm just trying to make a point
 
Its all good buddy. Its just that i find it amusing that after KS said some mildly unflattering words about Stoner there was a noticable disenfanchisement of #34. I just noticed it cuz something similar happened to me. U may not "remember" i guess. Or perhaps im confusing u with Mr. Squigz, u both sound so similar. It will be a new year soon amigo. I'll let bygones be bygones.
<
 
Ok. since you're acting as my all knowing conscious, tell me why Schwantz made my "banish list". Better yet, show me.



I always try to be forthcoming when I believe my support for a particular rider, mostly Stoner, affect my views. Look back through my posts, if you like, you'll often find disclaimers of such kind when I think they are appropriate.



That does not mean that every opinion I have about this sport is related to me being a fan of a rider. To be honest, it kills off any discussion to consantly assume that they are. Think of how easy it would be to turn that tactic around on you: 'you're against prototypes because Hayden cannot develope a bike', 'you're against Honda because they ...... Hayden', 'you're against fuel limits because Hayden is too fat'[sup]1[/sup]. How long before that becomes old?







[sup]1[/sup]no, I do not really claim these things, I'm just trying to make a point



Once you understand Jumkies sole motivation is simply to get a rise out of people by twisting and contorting every word they utter to support his own facile arguments, you soon begin to realise the fultility of actually having intelligent discourse with him.



I have abandoned actually directly responding to his countless fishing expeditions and now instead have a good laugh at the utter stupidity and hypocrisy of his utterances. If you do decide to engage him, sooner or later he will resort to his primary Modus Operandi by cherry picking some obscure comment you may have once made that he deems supportive of his own lame argument - even if that means he conveniently ignores the 1000 other statements you make that contradict his argument.



My advice - just ignore him and allow him to continue making a fool of himself....if however you do wish to respond to the rubbish he publishes as "facts" be safe in the knowledge that it is at the very least mildly amusing knowing how much time he wastes replying with his10 page essays that in all likelihood you probably wont bother reading anyway.
 
The lady doth protest too much.



(im sure the message is lost. U only ignore me cuz ur too weak to face ur double standards that i pointed out.)
<
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top