<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Jan 30 2009, 11:35 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Wait until you see the coverage. If it's the same yokels and the same commercial-laden coverage, you can be furious.
If DMG uses it's network pull to drastically up the coverage, I don't really care.
Obviously, this exercise in idiocy is at the request of the venue owners who want people to show up. If AMA racing was carried on network TV they could easily enforce blackouts, but it sounds like it is going to remain on speed.
The AMA is asking for handouts left and right to keep the series alive. There are going to be plenty of stupid arrangements brokered to scratch the backs of the charitable contributors.
The venue owners have stated on numerous occasions that they would prefer NOT to participate b/c the usually lose money on AMA events. Thankfully, many of them seem to be fans of motorcycles so they continue to lend their venues to AMA events in hopes that things improve.
That is one theory i considered,where the fan has no choice but to come to the track because of horrible tv coverage.The other is that the tv exec's have done their homework and took the fans pulse on the state of bike racing in America and found out the fan isnt buying what Roger is selling .If the audience isnt buying,neither is television.All i know is that AMA/DMG has become insignificant in the race fans eye and WSBK is about to explode.Im assuming Speed has the contract for WSBK here in the states,and im hoping they are not so stupid as to .... this up.I understand not being able to go live to Europe but they had better not screw around and show 1 tape delayed race on Sunday and then the other on Tuesday. That would be dropping the ball big time.I visit a lot of bike sites and WSBK is the buzz,and its a loud buzz.I have never seen the level of anticipation for a bike series that WSBK has generated for this year.