Ok as these are all hot topics of contention, which rule do you think is hurting the sport the most? For me, it's gotta be the lack of testing. Testing just reduces the chance of riders of figuring out the "sweet spot" set up for their bike, in turn reduces how many riders would get a chance at being competitive outside the "alien" four.
Close second gotta be the 990 to 800 rule. This deffinently hurt more than it helped in my opinion. Rather than an all around "race" (riders making up for lack of turning speed with straight away power), the championship is reduced to who has the balls to brake super late and carry a hell of a lot more speed into the turns. It's become all about corner speed and electronic control of the bike to maintain it without losing the rider.
Just my opinion, what do you guys think?
Close second gotta be the 990 to 800 rule. This deffinently hurt more than it helped in my opinion. Rather than an all around "race" (riders making up for lack of turning speed with straight away power), the championship is reduced to who has the balls to brake super late and carry a hell of a lot more speed into the turns. It's become all about corner speed and electronic control of the bike to maintain it without losing the rider.
Just my opinion, what do you guys think?
