- Joined
- Aug 27, 2007
- Messages
- 11,375
- Location
- Pomona NY
Ahhh, so he was paying attention to what I said.
Comparing 2011 development with 2010 - Ducati achieved zilch with the bike, Yamaha had some improvement, Honda developed a rocket-ship for their 2 top riders and supporting starters.
Honda developed a better gearbox. Ducati has already developed the same. Rossi should in theory be one second a lap faster than Stoner was last year.
Look at where Vale was when JB was away, completely lost !
Even after all team red would have learnt from JB all year was not able to get Rossi where he wanted to be.
So he not only needs the bike to be absolutely perfect but JB needs to be in his corner wiping his brow.
When JB left yamaha there was a lot of talk over team Jorge's ability in moving forward without JB's indirect insight.
Determination, raw ability and granted a decent bike has put Jorge in the mix each Race. Without JB.
Casey winning on the lemon (Duc) and winning on the Honda. Without JB.
I dont know is Rossi's legacy tainted, ?????
I'm trying to understand the logic of this post, and how someone can possibly dream up such consistently wrong data that is used in that logic ...........
all I can see is a vision of a stuffed teddy bear
Its not even talking! its just a stuffed teddy bear
Stoner, the best rider of the 800cc era, did so on the Ducati. You don't feel that perhaps your data may be flawed
Now he is on Honda he has become the best rider since he has been in motogp ( 2006 to now ), perhaps you can credit the Honda with this but it doesn't detract from the fact that nobody did as well as Stoner on the Ducati, even when Rossi was on the Yam.
So any discussion must have some truth in it if those questions are being asked? Okay.The fact that its even being discussed means that to some degree, yes, his legacy has been tainted.
So any discussion must have some truth in it if those questions are being asked? Okay.
Povol is Communist homosexual transvestite? Discuss.
It must be true if I'm talking about it, right?
So any discussion must have some truth in it if those questions are being asked? Okay.
Povol is Communist homosexual transvestite? Discuss.
It must be true if I'm talking about it, right?
Clearly maturity is not a pre requisite for being a one eyed Rossi fan.....
Well it certainly isn't apparent in any of your posts.
Would it be more intelligent of me to dribble about technical inadequacies of ducati and their R & D or should i post endless dribble about why Bridgestone aren't working towards Ducati's best interests
Bubbly
well, this is the type of discussion that our more intellegent and mature members tend to have, I'm not saying this is me at all. However the only real credible source we have is in agreement with the rubber issues being discussed.......as it is a motogp forum this kind of discussion is welcome by most, Stoner fanboys like yourself tend to post the same old .... and it isn't mature nor interesting.....
Just my opinion.
Rossi legacy will not significantly suffer at all from his Ducati performances, but Stoner's legacy will be very positively effected. If you crash a truck into a small car the car changes shape much more than the truck. Rossi's legacy is like a truck, it will take something huge to smash it up. Stoner's legacy is much smaller so far, so it is much more liable to change dramtically due to the hindsight offered by current events.