http://www.motomatters.com/news/2010/03/15..._and_video.html
Looking at Dovi's bike compared to Dani's bike there are a couple of big differences.
1) The tank on Dani's bike is chopped down so it is significantly shorter.
2) The cowl on Dani's bike is significantly longer.
Both of these differences push Dani a lot further forward than Dovi on the bike. I wonder how much this different placement of the rider impacts the setup of the bikes on race weekend and therefore usefulness of data between the riders but also from a development point of view. I would imagine that the bike is developed around the rider being located within a specific range of the centre of gravity. Could this be the reason why Dovi is happier than Dani with the chassis dynamics because he is located within the range that the bike was developed around?
Looking at Dovi's bike compared to Dani's bike there are a couple of big differences.
1) The tank on Dani's bike is chopped down so it is significantly shorter.
2) The cowl on Dani's bike is significantly longer.
Both of these differences push Dani a lot further forward than Dovi on the bike. I wonder how much this different placement of the rider impacts the setup of the bikes on race weekend and therefore usefulness of data between the riders but also from a development point of view. I would imagine that the bike is developed around the rider being located within a specific range of the centre of gravity. Could this be the reason why Dovi is happier than Dani with the chassis dynamics because he is located within the range that the bike was developed around?