<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Eagle088 @ Oct 13 2006, 02:07 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I really hate to be arguemenative, and you are correct to a point about weight on the rear to be stable. Think about this however, if you are downshifting and the slipper clutch is engadged the rear wheel is not spinning as fast as the front. This is how guys "back it in." Backing in to conrers however is not the quickest way around a race track and tends to take away from mid-corner speed. If you can keep the tires in line you will have a better chance to keep your corner speed up.
Ok. Now, under heavy braking somtimes the rear breaks loose with the slightest provocation and the rear will break loose to the opposite side of the footrest with the most weight on it. So it would also follow that if the bike is leaned at even 3 or 4 degrees the rear will want to break loose to the outside also. So the idea behind the technique would be to weight the outside footpeg as much as possible and keeping as much weight off of the inside peg as you can. What better way than to take the foot off the peg altogether.
Also I have seen some people do this as a dirt tracker type reaction if they think they are going to lock up the front because they think they can save it with thier foot. I have never seen that work out though.
Oh and i dont know what IMO means
Man, I don't want to be argumentative either, every racer got his own ideas about how to get a bike to do what he wants. I always tried to shift back on the seat and weight the outside peg when braking hard, it worked for me, in some turns where the back end getting too light was an issue, some rear brake got some of that weight off the front. If your foot needs to move after downshifting for a lefthander so as to get the ball of your foot on the peg for the turn, I guess you move it. If what you do works for you, then it's okay, if your times are good then it's the right thing. This subject was kicked to death here a while back. Good to have another racer here.