Question for Krop?

Bazzers back. And being the saddo he is, has to quote his own posts to 'like'

You know there's a 'Like' button now don't you scaredy cat?

Geonerd Likes This said:

I like this

Click to expand...

You've posted 8 times and I didn't know? Welcome back dude.

Jumkie said:

^Jumkie does not like this

Click to expand...

^^^^ Willski finds this unnacceptable

BarryMachine said:

I like this.

Click to expand...

^Jumkielikesthis

#22 said:

/\ #22 Loves this

Click to expand...

^^^^ Willski finds this totally unacceptable

If Barry is back, then clearly Jumkie must coerce the return of Arabb.

levigarrett said:

If Barry is back, then clearly Jumkie must coerce the return of Arabb.

Click to expand...

Arrab pictured in the centre.....he's too busy with his band to be messing around on here

levigarrett said:

If Barry is back, then clearly Jumkie must coerce the return of Arabb.

Click to expand...

I never went away. Its just that folk I pissed off ..... pissed off , so I was not as noticeable.

That or the returning folk think the world stopped when they left.

#22 ...... have you finished a race yet ?

This is going to end in a gay marriage.

BarryMachine said:

I never went away. Its just that folk I pissed off ..... pissed off , so I was not as noticeable.

That or the returning folk think the world stopped when they left.

#22 ...... have you finished a race yet ?

Click to expand...

Plenty, now I've retired to go fishing like your wankboy hero. So of course now you'll never get a chance to show your 'skills' (or lack of) against me, not that there was any worry of that anyway

Still dreaming of backing a Ducati in with no rear brake?

Question for Kropo (or anyone else for that matter) now that the title seems out of reach, what if Honda do what Gigi did 'within the rules & consequences' and HRC unseals engines to 'fix the problem'? What is the "penalty/consequence" for this, starting from the pitlane in a race? (Remember when "factory" Suzuki used extra engines and Dorna waived penalty?) Seems a reasonable trade off instead of a 'crash inducing machine' (as has been painted by our trusted punditry). Hell they could claim they did it for "safety reasons". I could see the title of such an article now: 'RCV engines unsealed as a safety measure, DORNA approves waiver of penalty'.

Jumkie said:

Question for Kropo (or anyone else for that matter) now that the title seems out of reach, what if Honda do what Gigi did 'within the rules & consequences' and HRC unseals engines to 'fix the problem'? What is the "penalty/consequence" for this, starting from the pitlane in a race? (Remember when "factory" Suzuki used extra engines?) Seems a reasonable trade off instead of a 'crash inducing machine' (as has been painted by our trusted punditry). Hell they could claim they did it for "safety reasons". I could see the title of such an article now: 'RCV engines unsealed as a safety measure, DORNA approves waiver of penalty'.

Click to expand...

I think that would depend whether Carmelo wakes up one day after listening to Honda begging, and decides to confer "preferred winner status" upon HRC. Using safety as the reason for allowing for technical changes has always been a favored go-to excuse for manipulating the outcome of a season, however dubious the reasoning comes across as.

Were I Nakamoto, I'd probably be singing to Dorna that the sport's future commercial golden goose in MurderMac is at risk of dying out there --no matter that it has everything to do with his riding style-- because of Casey Stoner's technical feedback. Threats of pulling out of MotoGP should be strategically deployed as well due to unfair rules being drawn up that penalize those with the best interests of safety at heart, all tongue-in-cheek of course.