Qatar Rd 1 2017

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Circumstances have changed drastically since 2009 and 2010. This is not when Lorenzo was a 2nd year rider and Rossi was 29-30 years old and still at his peak.
That's right. They gave a 2nd year rider equal status with Rossi at his peak.

Over the last 3 years, Rossi has outscored Lorenzo and YRT were perfectly justified in giving his equal status in 2015.

Yamaha did not show Rossi the door in 2010. Do not even attempt to engage in that kind of ........ revisionist history.
This is just base semantics on your part.

Rossi gave YRT a him-or-me ultimatum, they showed him the door. If you wish to read that as '........ revisionist history', so be it.

Yamaha went out of their way to back Rossi and do everything to appease him while they gave Lorenzo the middle finger and did not celebrate his championship as they would have had Sepang 2015 never occurred.

Again, you still aren't getting that the article was not referring to Movistar. The "they" refers to Yamaha. If it meant Movistar only, it would have said so.
Movistar cancels championship party at Valencia.

Do me a favor, don't start becoming ignorant and obtuse to reality.
I'm certainly not obtuse to the reality of the celebration being cancelled before the Valencia race.
 
It's possible Lorenzo would like to do any number of things. However... if all he wanted was a less demanding lifestyle - he's hugely wealthy and could afford to .... off to his own private island.

We've all seen how many times he (and many other well-paid racers) has been grievously injured, doctored up and returned to the fight. The guy is a racer and racers want to win. The challenge of racing is what defines these guys. It's who they are.

Given his track record with Yamaha - he should have had final say over Rossi who turned his back on them and then used Carmelo's influence to force them to take him back. By all rights - the rider who brings home the most constructor's championship winning points should be the one to head development. Two riders with different riding styles cannot co-design the same bike. It's never to my knowledge worked that way in any factory effort.

I have to say I think the Yamaha bike itself has always pretty much suited both riders, it again (as always as MV would doubtless say) comes down to tyres imo, and I doubt Yamaha developed 2 significantly different bikes in 2008, one for each tyre make. Lorenzo's problem last year was mainly not having tyres which suited his riding style imo, and I guess some blame attaches to him for being insufficiently adaptable, but as I "always" say I can't see why he can't have a tyre which suits him. From Yamaha's point of view I guess they have a new guy who can ride the current tyres who has a longer career ahead of him and probably costs substantially less. I never had a problem with Yamaha re-hiring Rossi for 2013 either given he was the best available rider.

If he left because he wanted sole number 1 status rather than being content with true dual number 1 status, then like Rossi in 2010 he made an ego based misjudgement. I believe Yamaha have mostly treated the two of them in particular evenly, but that has certainly not always been the case for other riders in the past, and I would surmise that a big factor for JL was that the tide had so moved against him at the team for whom he had won 42 races and their 3 most recent titles that they preferred a rider other than him to win, which I don't think ever applied the other way around, and would make for a fairly dispiriting work place. I personally would leave such a workplace, but probably not for one where I was unlikely to be able to achieve anything if I was financially secure.
 
Last edited:
That's right. They gave a 2nd year rider equal status with Rossi at his peak.

Over the last 3 years, Rossi has outscored Lorenzo and YRT were perfectly justified in giving his equal status in 2015.


This is just base semantics on your part.

Rossi gave YRT a him-or-me ultimatum, they showed him the door. If you wish to read that as '........ revisionist history', so be it.


Movistar cancels championship party at Valencia.


I'm certainly not obtuse to the reality of the celebration being cancelled before the Valencia race.

3 years is an arbitrary number that you purposely use since it's a half-assed effort to try and stack the deck in your favor. Try going to 4 years (2013 thru 2016) and you will see who really scored more points

Lorenzo: 1,156 points/21 wins/1 world championship
Rossi: 1,106 points/9 wins/0 world championships

If you were picking one over the other based on nothing more than those 3 sets of numbers, you're going to take the top over the bottom every single time because the overall results are better where it most matters; wins and championships.

Semantics? Absolutely not. There's a huge difference between him leaving of his own choosing versus the team telling him he isn't wanted back. There's a difference between quitting (leaving on your own) and being fired (shown the door). Try and get unemployment. You may find it hard if you were fired/shown the door. Courts make a huge distinction between the two.

Again, Movistar was not the only event canceled.

FYI: Being woefully ignorant is not an admirable trait on any level. You have a proclivity to argue from a position of ignorance. It's ....... annoying.
 
3 years is an arbitrary number that you purposely use since it's a half-assed effort to try and stack the deck in your favor. Try going to 4 years (2013 thru 2016) and you will see who really scored more points
2013 was Rossi's first year back on the M1 and he spent the year as Lorenzo's #2.

Lorenzo: 1,156 points/21 wins/1 world championship
Rossi: 1,106 points/9 wins/0 world championships
Close enough to merit equal treatment, even if Lorenzo's contract was more generous.

If you were picking one over the other based on nothing more than those 3 sets of numbers, you're going to take the top over the bottom every single time because the overall results are better where it most matters; wins and championships.
Rossi had more of both in 2009 when Lorenzo received equal billing.

Semantics? Absolutely not. There's a huge difference between him leaving of his own choosing versus the team telling him he isn't wanted back. There's a difference between quitting (leaving on your own) and being fired (shown the door). Try and get unemployment. You may find it hard if you were fired/shown the door. Courts make a huge distinction between the two.
Semantics. The core point still remains that 'yellow-tinged' Yamaha rejected Rossi's demands even knowing that the end result would be a parting of ways.

Again, Movistar was not the only event canceled.
AFAIK only one post-season gala celebration was scheduled.

FYI: Being woefully ignorant is not an admirable trait on any level. You have a proclivity to argue from a position of ignorance. It's ....... annoying.
I believe this argument started with your claim about Rossi & Lorenzo being offered 'identical contracts'.
 
Last edited:
No, the money is not the point. There are people making disrespectful comments on FB and websites like crash.net, yet they're not paying anything to get the "right" to be .........

The point is if people don't even respect individuals that fight in a war zone, what makes you think everyone will respect guys that ride a motorcycle in circles around a track? It's not about justifying it, but putting things into perspective.

I didn't reply last night because argumentum ad hominem towards which I was inclined is intrinsically logically flawed, although I can't help but reflect that Povol is again proven correct about a certain element among MotoGP fandom having a very poor understanding of the sport they purport to follow, which Keshav has pretty much also said.

Of course there is no obligation to respect individual riders equally or even at all, which was not my point, which like Birdman's I believe was rather that what they are doing, partly for the purpose of entertaining us, should be respected, particularly when they crash, crashes being the aspect of the sport which kills people, the riders being young healthy men not very prone to myocardial infarcts etc, and riders not being particularly prone to breaking up due to wind shear while riding on straights in my experience watching the sport. The least of them are also riding at a level at which the average bike rider, let alone the average Manchester United fan, would crash with a risk of significant injury as I believe was also Birdman's point

Your argument about Vietnam vets is ludicrous, given that Vietnam vets being booed I would have thought would be considered unequivocally bad, and your argument akin to arguing that because murderers sometimes kill multiple people an individual murder is nothing to cause concern. As far as I am aware booing Vietnam vets has also never attained the status of a sport for paying spectators either.
 
Last edited:
3 years is an arbitrary number that you purposely use since it's a half-assed effort to try and stack the deck in your favor. Try going to 4 years (2013 thru 2016) and you will see who really scored more points

Lorenzo: 1,156 points/21 wins/1 world championship
Rossi: 1,106 points/9 wins/0 world championships

If you were picking one over the other based on nothing more than those 3 sets of numbers, you're going to take the top over the bottom every single time because the overall results are better where it most matters; wins and championships.

Semantics? Absolutely not. There's a huge difference between him leaving of his own choosing versus the team telling him he isn't wanted back. There's a difference between quitting (leaving on your own) and being fired (shown the door). Try and get unemployment. You may find it hard if you were fired/shown the door. Courts make a huge distinction between the two.

Again, Movistar was not the only event canceled.

FYI: Being woefully ignorant is not an admirable trait on any level. You have a proclivity to argue from a position of ignorance. It's ....... annoying.


He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts… for support
rather than illumination.
 
2013 was Rossi's first year back on the M1 and he spent the year as Lorenzo's #2.


Close enough to merit equal treatment, even if Lorenzo's contract was more generous.


Rossi had more of both in 2009 when Lorenzo received equal billing.


Semantics. The core point still remains that 'yellow-tinged' Yamaha rejected Rossi's demands even knowing that the end result would be a parting of ways.


AFAIK only one post-season gala celebration was scheduled.


I believe this argument started with your claim about Rossi & Lorenzo being offered 'identical contracts'.

Absolutely not semantics. A court wouldn't share your opinion about the very real distinction between to the two things.

And I clarified what my statement was as I had not phrased it properly. But you seem to be desperate to score some sort of points here. Had you only replied to that portion and it turned into this argument, your assessment might be accurate. This isn't an argument, nor is it a debate. You are as usual mistaking factual information for subjective information...something you have repeatedly demonstrated not understanding when you attempt to interact with other posters on here.
 
He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts… for support
rather than illumination.

Kant tries to stack every argument of his with half-baked readings of situations, or outright imagining that facts are somehow capable of being debated. Kind of interesting how that works.
 
Kant tries to stack every argument of his with half-baked readings of situations, or outright imagining that facts are somehow capable of being debated. Kind of interesting how that works.

He is not such a bad chap, and fights a good fight.

I do have a problem with his standards of evidence, with "reasonable inferences" drawn in regard to events 10 years ago, said inferences perhaps being drawn from old Dorna press releases, apparently sufficing for arguments of his, but forensic scrutiny being applied to arguments, and their level of evidence, with which he disagrees.
 
Last edited:
Your argument about Vietnam vets is ludicrous, given that Vietnam vets being booed I would have thought can he considered unequivocally bad, and your argument akin to arguing that because murderers sometimes kill multiple people an individual murder is nothing to cause concern. As far as I am aware booing Vietnam vets has also never attained the status of a sport for paying spectators either.

Complete digression here:
If you can track it down, have a read of Lembcke's "Spitting Image". Very interesting examination/debunking of the "vets getting spat on" meme.
 
Complete digression here:
If you can track it down, have a read of Lembcke's "Spitting Image". Very interesting examination/debunking of the "vets getting spat on" meme.

Interesting if it was mainly apocryphal. It was somewhat before my time here in Australia, but the troops definitely to my knowledge didn't get much in the way of a welcome home or thanks, and do seem to have been treated shabbily, including by their own accounts with Normie Rowe one high profile complainer/campaigner, particularly given conscription was government policy.
 
Last edited:
Or he may have thrown it down the road.

Marquez regrets not keeping the hard tire.


Marquez: “The tyre was our biggest mistake”

A last minute switch to the medium front in Qatar for the reigning Champion

Marc Marquez (Repsol Honda Team) had the hard tyre in the plan for the #QatarGP, but after a delayed start and shortened race distance, the rider from Cervera switched to the medium. Battling at the front of the field in the early stages in signature spectacular style, Marquez then dropped back slightly as he struggled with the front and just lost touch with the podium battle.

Formerly aiming for the podium or the victory with a little help from lady luck, the tyre switch meant the number 93 couldn’t brake how he wanted - so the Spaniard switched quickly to damage limitation: finishing the race and looking forward to Argentina.

MM93, P4: “We were aware that we struggle a bit at this track, but as always we kept a positive attitude, as we also knew that if everything was in place, we could have fought for the podium or even the victory. I think we worked well over the weekend, and we had everything clear for today. Our plan was to use the harder front compound, but the chaotic situation with the rain and the continuous delays created many doubts. In the end we decided to go with the medium front, aiming to reduce the risk of crashing, but this turned out to be our biggest mistake of the weekend. I struggled with the front the entire time; I couldn’t brake hard and after few laps the tyre was already wearing off. We continued to have some small issues with acceleration, but even so I had a good feeling with my bike. But with that tyre choice, I wasn’t able to gain on braking. That’s my strongest point, so I decided, okay let’s finish this race and Argentina will be another race.”

http://www.motogp.com/en/news/2017/03/27/marquez-the-tyre-was-our-biggest-mistake/222532
 
I never thought much of Colin Edwards, and never thought he should have had the factory Yamaha seat period. Spies didn't help himself, but he did win on the M1 and finished 5th that season (2011) but 2012 was a .... show for a lot of reasons as we know. Either way once Rossi wanted out of Ducati, Spies had no chance at all in the team.

Lorenzo left Yamaha because he got tired of dealing with Rossi and all the ........ that comes with it. 3 world championships and scores of races won, and what does Yamaha do in 2015? Cancel the party for Lorenzo so as to not offend Rossi. Imagine that...you just won one of the most closely contested championships in history against your own teammate, and your team thanks you by canceling the championship party. Given the way Yamaha bent over backwards to accommodate Rossi and to try and soothe his feelings in favor of the person who had been doing the heavy lifting for them from 2010 on, I don't fault him for wanting to leave. Sure the money no doubt factored in as well since Yamaha had the gall to offer him and Rossi identical contracts in spite of Lorenzo winning more grands prix and championships since 2010. That's insane. So in his haste to get away from the toxic environment at Yamaha, he at the bare minimum cut his throat for 2017 by choosing to go to the one team that has fielded a bike for over a decade that is decidedly not conducive to riders who rely on perfectly balanced machines to achieve success. I guess it's easy to second-guess him, but I wonder even if he never wins a single race for Ducati, if it will have been worth it just for the fact that he doesn't have to deal with Yamaha's toxic ........ environment. He made the decision he thought was best at the expense of winning races and titles just to get away from Rossi/Yamaha. That says a ton about what Yamaha really stands for. Some posters here of course think Yamaha is the perfect team environment even though nothing really indicates this. I do agree with you that he should have entertained Suzuki as another option. He still probably would have had issues, but not the seemingly insurmountable mountain he currently faces at Ducati. The only one who is going to win out here is Dovizioso strangely. But it's actually had the effect of making me a bit more appreciative of what he has done the past few years at Ducati, and his overall commitment to the team.

Maybe part of my issue with Vinales isn't so much the man himself but a couple of external factors that are being lost in the shuffle.

1) The media went racing to anoint him the second coming of, well whatever as soon as the signing was made official as did the glory-hunting contingent of Rossi's fanbase. The fans know they are on limited time with Rossi, and their need to live vicariously through a rider is leading them to hedge their bets as is seen with Vudu and the like. Marquez didn't pan out for them, so Vinales represents the next best thing since he's on a Yamaha and they won't need to switch manufacturer allegiances, thus rendering all of their merchandise obsolete. Plus Vinales is not Lorenzo in temperament and disposition. I never had any issue with Lorenzo's personality as is the case with the majority of posters here, but there is a much larger contingent out there that has judged Lorenzo solely on his personality. Lorenzo didn't know his place and I suspect those who felt so adamantly opposed to Lorenzo's personality --not so coincidentally, many of these complainers are the same people who whine to this day about Stoner's personality-- think he was the problem at Yamaha because we can't have people giving their honest opinion unless it conforms with their asinine worldviews.

2) The media went all-in on Vinales because after Sepang 2015, Marquez was an impossible sell to the general GP watching public. After committing the egregious act of racing a competitor (who just happened to be the 9-times god) during a championship battle, the media hit the sell-all button on Marquez. He was no longer the heir apparent to VR as seemed to be the case just 2 years earlier at that point. They feed the VR46 fanbase the ........ they want to hear and selling MM as the best thing in the wake of Sepang was never going to go down with the readership, and losing readership means losing money. So that was off the table instantly. Vinales represents a great opportunity for the media and fans, they have a "clean slate" with which to attach their horse to and to spin whatever pleasing tale needs to be spun in order to get Vinales in the hearts and minds of the majority of GP fans.

3) In this haste to christen Vinales as the next best thing, Marquez has simply turned into an afterthought. Here's a guy who is one of the truly greatest talents to ever grace the grid, and after winning 3 titles in 4 seasons, and making it 5 overall titles at an age younger than Rossi, he's been relegated to just kind of being there. Just say you swapped out Marquez's name for Rossi, and that was what Rossi's achievements since 2013 are...you wouldn't be able to turn on the TV during a grand prix weekend without hearing the commentators jerking off over it...and forget the media contingent. They would be sitting in the room during press conferences with tents in their pants. Again that goes back to Sepang 2015 and the media jumping ship on Marquez. You'd actually be hard-pressed to remember he just won a title in 2016, doing so on a very unfavorable bike. Yet...according to one enterprising poster here, the RCV was a great bike even though every report and rider assessment was the complete opposite. It's sad that his achievements, much like Lorenzo's are either disparaged, downplayed, or ignored in favor of someone with zero titles and 2 race wins.

Vinales is going to win plenty of races, and who knows how many titles now that Lorenzo took himself out of contention. I just want to see more of a body of work from him before anything is anointed, and really, given how Lorenzo dropped back on the Ducati, it should be more than apparent about how important it is to be on the M1. Sure you need the talent to get the results, and yes Vinales is more talented than Edwards or Spies ever were. You're assured of less issues on that bike than any other because Yamaha's overall philosophy never changes, and they stay focused on the balance of that bike. HRC and Ducati .... around too much with trying to build powerful engines that come at the expense of everything else with the bike.

I hear you on Edwards though he did provide me with one of the greatest seasons in WSB when he faced Troy Bayliss at the Showdown at Imola. Granted this is a MotoGP forum and therefore not relevant but it does explain why I have a soft spot for him.

In that championship Edwards had an uphill struggle against favourite Bayliss and his shotgun riding partner Ruben Xaus. WSB was my first entry into bike racing and hence I think it nurtured in me a desire to always look for the underdog that Edwards had been in WSB, when watching races within MotoGP.

Yes, Rossi was the star and an undeniable talent who never stopped fighting, never settled and always made a race worth watching. But I was always more concerned with those who had the courage to take the fight to him - Gibernau, Stoner, Lorenzo. And what connected those riders is how unfairly treated they were by the media. I couldn't understand the media's short sightedness.

Formula1 was tanking in boring, processional races yet here were underdog racers prepared to take on the all conquering god and make the televised races exciting. Why then weren't the media nurturing these underdogs? Why couldn't they see the publicity gold from having battling races to draw the crowds from F1. How couldn't they see that the policy of demonising or at best failing to recognise these underdogs indicated that all they wanted to .... over was a never ending series of one horse races?

Anyway, that's all by the by.

I agree that Lorenzo clearly just had enough at Yamaha. I guess there was only so many times that he could stomach seeing Lyn Jarvis' disappointed face when his clearly preferred rider wasn't coming in first. The actions of cancelling that party were outrageous and proof that once again daring to challenge or fight Rossi was a race that could only ever be one on the track because off it, he held all the cards and virtually everyone's balls.

The Ducati is a troublesome beast and though it may be fast, only one guy really managed to tame it. Dovi has done some great work with it and whether he will be willing to impart any of that to Jorge is a question that time will tell. I can understand him not being overly forthcoming but as much as I like Dovi he's always been a bit of an also runner. Whether Jorge coming in will light a fire under him I don't know but I'd certainly like to see it.

I'd love to see Lorenzo do well and despite his amazing talent, he has in the past suffered from a loss of performance/concentration when things aren't going his own way. Maybe he'll take this season just to iron out the problems, do some solid testing and enjoy the money without having to endlessly keep tabs on his manipulating & manouvering team mate.

Moving on to the race I was delighted to see Zarco have a go. I don't watch Moto2 so he was a complete surprise. Granted he might fade into obscurity but if nothing else I admire his spunk and get up and go to do his best to seize his opportunity.

As for the remainder of the race, my recording cut off with 17 laps to go so congrats to Vinales, hard luck to Dovi and fingers crossed that people keep their hunger up for Argentina.
 
That's right. They gave a 2nd year rider equal status with Rossi at his peak.

Over the last 3 years, Rossi has outscored Lorenzo and YRT were perfectly justified in giving his equal status in 2015.


This is just base semantics on your part.

Rossi gave YRT a him-or-me ultimatum, they showed him the door. If you wish to read that as '........ revisionist history', so be it.


Movistar cancels championship party at Valencia.

I'm certainly not obtuse to the reality of the celebration being cancelled before the Valencia race.

They gave a second year rider who had just won the championship equal status with a guy who had been making direct public statements about leaving GP bike racing entirely for WRC, F1 etc. If I was in the business of drawing "reasonable inferences" myself, I could surmise that Valentino was considering retiring and told Yamaha so, then changed his mind, not wanting to go out on the note of his injury affected 2010 season.

I do think Yamaha could have dealt with the circumstances a little better in 2010, VR had very genuinely done a lot for them, and one of the things which reputedly annoyed Valentino was that they apparently gave him a spiel about Yamaha's straitened finances requiring them to cut his salary subsequent to which he discovered they had significantly raised Jorge's salary at the same time. Jorge admittedly after being backed by Yamaha in 2010 then proceeded not to show them total loyalty himself, and screwed the pooch by dallying with other teams.

You do move the goalposts in regard to arguments depending on whether they are your arguments or opposing ones, with minor points margins in non title winning seasons being crucial when it suits despite you having argued previously that Jorge's actual title win was less compelling because of the small margin. Bottom line is that no-one will care about the minor placings in the title race long term or even pretty much now, while title wins and race wins are forever as JPS implies. There was not much talk of how many second placed finishes English riders had managed when Crutchlow had the first premier class race win by an English rider since Sheene last year, and Marco Melandri is not rated as a top echelon GP bike rider despite his second in the 2005 championship.
 
Last edited:
Marquez regrets not keeping the hard tire.


Marquez: “The tyre was our biggest mistake”

A last minute switch to the medium front in Qatar for the reigning Champion

Marc Marquez (Repsol Honda Team) had the hard tyre in the plan for the #QatarGP, but after a delayed start and shortened race distance, the rider from Cervera switched to the medium. Battling at the front of the field in the early stages in signature spectacular style, Marquez then dropped back slightly as he struggled with the front and just lost touch with the podium battle.

Formerly aiming for the podium or the victory with a little help from lady luck, the tyre switch meant the number 93 couldn’t brake how he wanted - so the Spaniard switched quickly to damage limitation: finishing the race and looking forward to Argentina.

MM93, P4: “We were aware that we struggle a bit at this track, but as always we kept a positive attitude, as we also knew that if everything was in place, we could have fought for the podium or even the victory. I think we worked well over the weekend, and we had everything clear for today. Our plan was to use the harder front compound, but the chaotic situation with the rain and the continuous delays created many doubts. In the end we decided to go with the medium front, aiming to reduce the risk of crashing, but this turned out to be our biggest mistake of the weekend. I struggled with the front the entire time; I couldn’t brake hard and after few laps the tyre was already wearing off. We continued to have some small issues with acceleration, but even so I had a good feeling with my bike. But with that tyre choice, I wasn’t able to gain on braking. That’s my strongest point, so I decided, okay let’s finish this race and Argentina will be another race.”

http://www.motogp.com/en/news/2017/03/27/marquez-the-tyre-was-our-biggest-mistake/222532


"I think with the hard I was able to fight for the victory until the end. But maybe also was able to crash. Because the hard in the end also is no warning, less warning - maybe if I put the hard, I'm more competitive but I crash."
 
"I think with the hard I was able to fight for the victory until the end. But maybe also was able to crash. Because the hard in the end also is no warning, less warning - maybe if I put the hard, I'm more competitive but I crash."

Its not like Vudu to be wrong and/or omit something from and article or quote. I'm shocked at this news.
 
He was still wrong. On the same website is the video of Marquez being interviewed where he says that.

Maybe, but the actual article does not, so in fact you were the wrong one :ninja:
 
He was still wrong. On the same website is the video of Marquez being interviewed where he says that.

The only thing Dani has left in the tank are attempted "gotcha" posts.

You'll never see some well-reasoned and thought out post that contains insightful analysis. Well the one time I thought he did that, it turned out to be a copy and paste job that he didn't bother citing or quoting. I was understandably disappointed as my lofty hopes and expectations came plummeting back to Earth with the speed I would expect Chris Christie to fall from the sky were he shoved out of Jerry Jones' Gulfstream V.
 

Recent Discussions

Back
Top