Pedrosa, what do you think ?

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Teomolca @ Jul 8 2008, 02:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Nah to me he hasn't done any egregius act to Nicky at all. He ...... up at Estoril and took down another rider, it was unfortunate that the other rider was his teammate but it happens all the time. He did act as a teammate the next race staying put behind Nicky to maximise Nicky's title chances and it all worked fine.
All the nonsense about antics and .... talking I wont ever bother discussing I completely disgree, everything I've hear him say in all his career is what any other rider would say, maybe you should read something else than superbikeplanet et al that seem so biased and false I wonder it they were written by Nicky's mom.
I don't know if HRC developed the 07 bike to suit Dani (I really doubt it since this projects start more than a year before they are on track, and by the time Dani wasn't even in MotoGP) but anyway if they fine tuned the design to suit Dani I find a very reasonable thing to do since it became obvious to them, and to all the rest of the world (that isn't a Nicky fan) who was the better rider for the future.
As you correctly quoted I said faster, not better, Nicky was the better overall rider in 2006 (I mean between teammates, obviously Rossi was better).
Oh and by the way, Dani is a 3x world champion, which is far from "NOT winning jack ....", I will not write an example of what not winning jack .... is cause I don't have anything against Nicky and it would be cruel to him to point the finger at him just to piss you off like you pretend to do the other way round.
I wish Nicky the best, he seems a decent guy and and he is a good rider.


<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (michaelm @ Jul 8 2008, 05:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Does anybody really believe the hayden thing, whilst strategically unsound in the circumstances at the very least, was anything other than an attempt to beat hayden in that race? It was also his first season, and most if not all have taken out other riders in their careers, although doing so to your own team-mate is admittedly less common. The other point if honda are as malevolent as is perceived to be the case by many, including me to an extent, is that honda may not have issued any team orders.


Mike & Teo, its rather absurd to think that the crash was simply trying to beat your teammate. Have you and the rest who think it was just a "racing incident" forgotten that this was the penultimate round going into the last race showdown with rival Rossi Yamaha & co. Peders was only trying to make a selfish statement spawned by jealousy, entitlement, and arrogance because Hayden had stolen his thunder and wanted the attention back on himself; nothing more nothing less! I’ve never said he crashed into Hayden on purpose, what I am saying is he knew what was at stake and ignored it. He came as close to sabotaging and crashing on purpose as one can get because of a his character flaw. Honda may not have given team orders because as dumb as they are they never dreamed that Peders would have jeopardized a championship. Teo says that it wasn't decisive? Well of course, in hindsight. Whoever subscribes to this logic then believes this is relevant. Well then, had it not turned out that Nicky won, this would have been magically irrelevant? Think of this logic. If it’s relevant then it’s relevant regardless of the outcome.

Obviously most his countryman are gonna say it was just a racing incident to support their man, I suppose the same could be said about Americans. However, there has been plenty on the record after that incident, and it has always pointed to Peder’s sense of arrogant entitlement thus confirming for me what I had already surmised. Turning a blind eye to his continuous arrogant quotes and .... talking toward his teammate is simply head-in-the-sand bias. There are enough quotes and antics to support the notion that Pedrosa is an arrogant fool who would do whatever it takes, even when realistically eliminated from the title, to prove a selfish point as he did in Portugal.

Teo says Peders got in line the next race, well no ...., considering what was at stake in that final showdown! But it wasn’t because he was Mr. Prudent Guy all of a sudden, but for a moment the world got a glimpse of the ....... he really was and is and he backed down for the moment (I'm sure somebody at Honda in a moment of clarity realized the laughing stock they had become and tried to save face.) But go trying to rewrite history saying he was a model citizen is rather pathetic.

Teo, that pretty clever of you taking a dig at Nicky's mom (not sure why you included her into the discussion, perhaps your reverting to your younger years), while your guy has a grown man like Aberto Puig who is so detached from reality that he came out and said (in no uncertain terms) that the crash was Hayden's fault! This is the type of man who whispers in Peder's ear. What effect might that have do you think? Well I'll answer; it fosters the character of an arrogant fool detached from reality. It kicker is, they have bamboozled HRC into this game. At the moment Rossi and Stoner have his number, and when Lorenzo gets healthy he will also chime in. Like I said, Peders is fast but why wouldn’t he be, afterall, he's pretty much had it his way, even when he ...... up royally.

Oh, and when I said he hadn’t won jack ...., I was talking about a MotoGP title. Unless Peders can handle a dirt-track bike (they are standard and not made for jocky’s) then lets not go counting previous titles shall we. You can believe that the lower classes mean something, but if you do that, then feel free to pile on Hayden’s “lower” class titles as well.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>I don't know if HRC developed the 07 bike to suit Dani

This pretty much says everything I need to know about your touch with reality and knowledge of the sport.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Jul 9 2008, 02:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Honda may not have given team orders because as dumb as they are they never dreamed that Peders would have jeopardized a championship.
It is hard to disagree that one would expect a competitor in this position to make up his own mind to do everything possible to help his team-mate, although not to do so is probably not entirely unprecedented in motorsports.

I did not follow the points race as avidly in 2006 once the ducatis had no chance but I was happy that nicky won, and I still watched the races of course. My recollection is that nicky only needed to place respectably in the last 2 races and had no need to win to take the championship; I think he quite possibly could have won the last race if it was absolutely necessary(EDIT once rossi had crashed). I don't think even honda are so bloody minded or as you say so stupid as to not want to win a championship with their number two rider, although some would again say this is not unprecedented in motorsports with ferrari and eddie irvine as one example. However if pedrosa was the anointed one and honda's future design direction had been decided in his favour as many say, I don't think it is inconceivable that repsol honda may have wanted pedrosa to win the last 2 races or at least beat hayden in them to justify this.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (michaelm @ Jul 9 2008, 03:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I think he quite possibly could have won the last race if it was absolutely necessary.

lol, so for the last 20 races it musnt of been necessary for him to win?
in fact it hasnt even been necesarry for hayden to even podium hahahahha
<


point is, he was around 4th fastest in valencia, warm up, qualies, practice and race, even if he "needed" to win, no way would hayden of won that race in 06.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Jul 9 2008, 03:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>This pretty much says everything I need to know about your touch with reality and knowledge of the sport.

None of us know if that bike was built just for dani (some of us believe it was) but it was certainly developed in his favour and rightly so.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Jul 8 2008, 09:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>it was designed for Pedrosa, then this might give you some insight to why he is “faster” as you say. I don’t really know how you could say he was better than Nicky in 06, last I checked he didn’t win the title, or runner up.

NOw without delving into the assumption that the 07 Honda was design specifically for Pedrosa, we can agree that it certainly suited him much better. You say this is insight into why Dani was better than Nicky that year. So why don't you do the same discredit to Nicky and remind everyone that the 06 bike was a one off just for Nickies title charge meanwhile Dani was riding a bike which didn't develop all year. Just an insight into why Nicky beat his Dani in 06
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Jul 9 2008, 04:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>This pretty much says everything I need to know about your touch with reality and knowledge of the sport.

What a coincidence I thought just the same about you after reading your posts!

Anyway I just wanted to the let other forumites read my opinion which in short is:

I think Dani is currently one of the 3 best rider in the world now and he will deserve it if he wins the title this year. He hasn't done anything reprobable during his career, he's played fair and straight always and the insults some people here tell him are totally NOT justified and probably caused by envy.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Teomolca @ Jul 9 2008, 01:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>What a coincidence I thought just the same about you after reading your posts!

Anyway I just wanted to the let other forumites read my opinion which in short is:

I think Dani is currently one of the 3 best rider in the world now and he will deserve it if he wins the title this year. He hasn't done anything reprobable during his career, he's played fair and straight alwaysand the insults some people here tell him are totally NOT justified and probably caused by envy.

I don't disagree that he's one of the best riders in the world and a genuine championship contender, and maybe some of the insults he gets on here are undeserved, but 'as for him never doing anything wrong and always playing fair' sorry but's that's just balls. This statement alone shows me that you are every bit as guilty of being biased and unobjective as any of us Hayden fans.
 
Of course I am, I'm just giving my opinion so neutral readers can get both sides of the story.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Jul 9 2008, 09:06 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>None of us know if that bike was built just for dani (some of us believe it was) but it was certainly developed in his favour and rightly so.

I think so, I don't know where it comes from, but I think it's very ridiculous by saying Honda built a bike to suit Dani only etc etc... don't judge people (Honda) with limited info or rumors you got. or have you really heard the statement from Honda about it? if not... then be wise man...
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Blue Cielo @ Jul 9 2008, 01:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I think so, I don't know where it comes from, but I think it's very ridiculous by saying Honda built a bike to suit Dani only etc etc... don't judge people (Honda) with limited info or rumors you got. or have you really heard the statement from Honda about it? if not... then be wise man...

I don't think the bike was conceived or designed with Dani specifically in mind. The reason why i think the bike was developed in his favour is that he was faster than Nicky all winter long and his input more productive than "I need to change my style". I don't recall exactly but i believe Dani was using a new suspension linkage in the early part of last year.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ Jul 9 2008, 02:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I don't think the bike was conceived or designed with Dani specifically in mind. The reason why i think the bike was developed in his favour is that he was faster than Nicky all winter long and his input more productive than "I need to change my style". I don't recall exactly but i believe Dani was using a new suspension linkage in the early part of last year.

Maybe you are right Tom, thanks. I myself didn't follow the season very much, I just get into it when the winter testing began in december 2007, where Dani fell and hurt and Nicky did the work by developing the bike for 2008. He (Nicky) was only faster when he was using 2007 spec bike in Sepang - Malaysia, and in Losail (Qatar) he was confused whether to use the old bike or the new one, he chose the old one and you saw the result, I read it in crash.net that it was his decision to choose the old bike in Losail... don't get me wrong, I like Hayden, but it will be much better to read the comments if it is based on proofs or facts.

Sorry for my english, english is not my daily language, sorry for the mistakes if exist.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Blue Cielo @ Jul 9 2008, 02:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Maybe you are right Tom, thanks. I myself didn't follow the season very much, I just get into it when the winter testing began in december 2007, where Dani fell and hurt and Nicky did the work by developing the bike for 2008. He (Nicky) was only faster when he was using 2007 spec bike in Sepang - Malaysia, and in Losail (Qatar) he was confused whether to use the old bike or the new one, he chose the old one and you saw the result, I read it in crash.net that it was his decision to choose the old bike in Losail... don't get me wrong, I like Hayden, but it will be much better to read the comments if it is based on proofs or facts.

Sorry for my english, english is not my daily language, sorry for the mistakes if exist.

Yes Honda had a complicated time in winter testing coming from their disappointing 2007 season, I am hoping the worst of this is over and I think Honda are getting stronger again.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Teomolca @ Jul 9 2008, 01:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Of course I am, I'm just giving my opinion so neutral readers can get both sides of the story.
that's fair enough imo.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Teomolca @ Jul 9 2008, 01:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Of course I am, I'm just giving my opinion so neutral readers can get both sides of the story.

Are there are people who are neutral to Pedrosa?
Seems like there are fans, and everyone else generally dislikes him.
 
I think HRC had every intention of making Dani their #1 rider since he was drafted up and they successfully built a bike package that would allow Dani to be competitive after his rookie season was over. The RC211V was too big for Dani but arguably one of the best bikes ever developed by HRC.....The 212 was a heap of .... initially and although we'll never know for sure, all those hard laps that Nicky put in EVERY practice all went toward fixing a bike that was built to suit another rider. Naysayers will always say that the bike was built smaller to cut down its aerodynamic cross section, blah blah blah, but when you need a stool to get on the 211, you can't tell me they didn't make the bike smaller for Dani alone. In the end, I don't blame Dani or Nicky, just HRC.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Helix @ Jul 9 2008, 03:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Are there are people who are neutral to Pedrosa?
Seems like there are fans, and everyone else generally dislikes him.
im neutral. although he is not the type of person i would choose to go drinking with.,
 
Sorry, double post. I was watching the end of stage sprint in the tour de france.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Doc 79 @ Jul 9 2008, 03:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I think HRC had every intention of making Dani their #1 rider since he was drafted up and they successfully built a bike package that would allow Dani to be competitive after his rookie season was over. The RC211V was too big for Dani but arguably one of the best bikes ever developed by HRC.....The 212 was a heap of .... initially and although we'll never know for sure, all those hard laps that Nicky put in EVERY practice all went toward fixing a bike that was built to suit another rider. Naysayers will always say that the bike was built smaller to cut down its aerodynamic cross section, blah blah blah, but when you need a stool to get on the 211, you can't tell me they didn't make the bike smaller for Dani alone. In the end, I don't blame Dani or Nicky, just HRC.
As somebody said during a previous discussion on this topic, it is possible that the design philosophy by honda did come first and they then picked dani to suit the bike, obviously not only for his size because he is extremely talented, but perhaps partly for this reason. As I recall people considered this disquieting.

I am neutral to mildly positive on dani. I think he is talented and in my view as previously stated in this thread the hayden estoril incident whilst (perhaps not very)arguably stupid was not malicious in intent. As teomolca said there is nothing else questionable along these lines in his entire career, and in the smaller classes he showed considerable intestinal fortitude in riding after injuries. Casey stoner certainly respects him, and I have a feeling actually worries about him more than rossi.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (michaelm @ Jul 9 2008, 10:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>As somebody said during a previous discussion on this topic, it is possible that the design philosophy by honda did come first and they then picked dani to suit the bike, obviously not only for his size because he is extremely talented, but perhaps partly for this reason. As I recall people considered this disquieting.
This could be. HRC does tend, like Ducati to be very machine focused as an organization. So I suppose I could see them doing this. My personal view is that they knew who they wanted and while their idea to make the bike smaller may have been on the table, they chose this option among others to suit Dani, which left Nicky out in the wind.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Doc 79 @ Jul 9 2008, 04:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>This could be. HRC does tend, like Ducati to be very machine focused as an organization. So I suppose I could see them doing this. My personal view is that they knew who they wanted and while their idea to make the bike smaller may have been on the table, they chose this option among others to suit Dani, which left Nicky out in the wind.

They did the same thing to Rossi in 02. Even though he is one of the biggest riders they made a tiny bike with minimal fairings and mass centralisation the key ideas. Rossi said make it bigger and they did, Nicky said he would adapt while Dani went fast and HRC supported that. They did what any team would have done unless #1 and #2 riders were clearly indicated in the contracts.
 

Recent Discussions

Back
Top