3555861373180141
One mistake too many Jumkie... If you lived in the UK, he wouldn't be allowed to ride that anywhere. No legal number plate, no indicators, no rear reflector, no mufflers, no stoplight. Unless he brought it in a van and unloaded it in the drive?
And a bad magazine scan can't substitute for a photograph - no Exif data. No metadata. No data at all, apart from the JPEG compression ratio. If it was a photograph uploaded to photobucket (which is where it came from -
http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd288/blue_angel65/bike2_zps5db9bd0a.jpg)
It would still have the exif data attached - Photobucket doesn't strip it.
Outed yourself.
Feel free to post the original, untouched photo to prove me wrong. As it stands, that's a dud.
Jumkie is a man, I'm a woman, big difference. We are not the same person, sorry to disappoint you. Though I do count Jumkie as a friend. That is a genuine picture of my neighbours house and his sons bike. He rode it to the house and he rode it away again I watched and heard him through my front window.
As for the picture, my neighbour took it on his camera and printed it off himself (not great quality) then I had to scan it into my computer. So yeah, not the best quality but it is what it says it is. Believe it or not, it's up to you! Oh and yes, I did upload it to photobucket, when I resized it (it was massive) I renamed it bike2, I named it bike when I scanned it in.
Sheesh, some people are so disbelieving