Natural Talent

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
(Side note: for the record, Gary McCoy was perhaps one of the most talented men in GP racing during his short stint in the series. He was able to take the KR Modenas 3 to a pole (how is that for taking a sub-par machine and doing something with it). He won three races against a talented field, and used a style and rear wheel that revolutionize the way engineers view traction and tire wear. Unfortunately, he crashed and ended his career, otherwise, I believe he would have been picked up by a top tier team and made more in achievement.)
[/quote]
Um dont you mean either WCMs Yamaha 500's or Jeremy Mcwilliams?(beware the pedant
<
)
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MigsAngel @ May 20 2008, 02:31 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Yep...everyone has a different idea of what constitute talent....if you take all those things and try to find a rider that fits them all then you may only find very few riders that fit the bill....Rossi definitely fits them all!
<


I still stick to my view that adaptablity is key to talent...
<


Jumkie and Sackwack think its talent is about riders from the US, but that could be down to bias. They do seem a bit grumpy after Sunday though, I wonder why?
<


pffft, Migs, if you read my post I actually agree with you. Natural Talent is being able to adapt to anything (surfing example). I said nothing about nationalism.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ May 20 2008, 04:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>After his recovery, he return to bikes, and devastated the field at the Isle of Mann.

And as the legend goes..grown men wept!

Apologies to 'Babel' for my last 'novel'...I'll be brief -just this once.

Bill Ivy, not a thinker, not a great racing head on him, just went out and rode the bike relying on huge reserves of natural talent.

Also how can any discussion on talent overlook Saarinen, who was cruelly taken before his time at one of my favourite circuits. Invented hang off/knee down, made Schwantz look tame. Phil Read called him wild and dangerous, that's 'cause most called him quick. Arguably King Kenny's biggest inspiration, Like Daijiro, Jarno was a massive prospect snuffed out before his prime.
 
You can have all the natural talent in the world, but it is worth nothing if you don't have the guts to exploit it.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thom @ May 20 2008, 07:56 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Um dont you mean either WCMs Yamaha 500's or Jeremy Mcwilliams?(beware the pedant
<
)
Actually Thom, it was the Proton KR3 that McWilliams took to a pole, in Australia 2002. (BTW, he also rode the Proton KR5). Had to look it up, thanks. (I must be getting old & senile, inside joke)
<
McWilliams/McCoy Brit/Aussie, they are all the same to me.
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ May 20 2008, 04:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Haha, yeah, I see you got nothing for FOOT-IN-MOUTH. You present your view to support your hate but then you are shown how narrow it was and you don't have the balls to recognize when you miss speak; I call that PATHETIC.

Now here you inject nationalism, to say its about US rider (I think you're showing your true core motives for disliking my examples, and disliking KRJR & Hayden; even more pathetic.
Still grumpy....I sure the talented mr HeyDone will avoid the KRJR fate of being shuffled out back door of MotoGP...

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ May 20 2008, 04:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>As far as the topic, a person I think embodied 'talent' in Motorcycle racing is Mike Hailwood.

Regarding Mr Hailwood, he was able to adapt and acheive so he meets most of the requirement set out by non-grumpy people here. The same could be said of Phil Read and John Surtees, but all these were men that rode in most classes as was the way it was done back then....We can talk about TT type road races (where GPs started) for talent ...We have to consider Foggy, J.McGuinness, D.Jeffries, Ron Haslam, and Joey and/or Robert Dunlop (RIP). All men on my list adapted to several bikes and tracks and conditions...most acheived, but not all were champions (or even one hit hero's)
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MigsAngel @ May 20 2008, 08:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Still grumpy....I sure the talented mr HeyDone will avoid the KRJR fate of being shuffled out back door of MotoGP...



Regarding Mr Hailwood, he was able to adapt and acheive so he meets most of the requirement set out by non-grumpy people here. The same could be said of Phil Read and John Surtees, but all these were men that rode in most classes as was the way it was done back then....We can talk about TT type road races (where GPs started) for talent ...We have to consider Foggy, J.McGuinness, D.Jeffries, Ron Haslam, and Joey and/or Robert Dunlop (RIP). All men on my list adapted to several bikes and tracks and conditions...most acheived, but not all were champions (or even one hit hero's)
massive talent there mate.
<
didnt highlight foggy cos he's a tosser, talented tosser tho.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MigsAngel @ May 20 2008, 08:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Regarding Mr Hailwood, he was able to adapt and acheive so he meets most of the requirement set out by non-grumpy people here.
Also, at the beginning of his career, if there was a bike out there that was faster than Mike's, Stan went straight out and bought him a better one.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ May 20 2008, 08:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>massive talent there mate.
<
didnt highlight foggy cos he's a tosser, talented tosser tho.
I can't argue with you on that one at all!
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MigsAngel @ May 20 2008, 12:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>1. Still grumpy....



2. Regarding Mr Hailwood, he was able to adapt and acheive.... The same could be said of
1. Ok, I'll take that as you unfurling the white flag of "I got nothing." >I accept.

2. I think there is a difference between "adaptability" and "versatility". I think you are using these interchangeably. You made a case that if a person can't win on a different engine configuration, then the rider had poor "adapting" ability, therefore, no "talent". I of course disagreed and showed you some examples of men who are clearly "talented" but had difficulty on new engines to defend their titles.

My point about Hailwood is that among the many aspects of talent, one of which was his “versatility”, which you interpret only as “adapting”. Well then if this is your measure of "talent", then you need to do a little homework. I realize you have a hang up about American racers, so you probably did not know that here in the early 80s (79-85) we had a racing event called "The Superbikers". It combined all the disciplines of motorcycle racing in the AMA: Flat track, Motor/Supercross,TT, Roadracing. Google it if you must, you will learn something and perhaps this way you can make more informed posts to present your "views". All the greats attended, champs from all these 'motorcycling' disciplines, NOT just ‘roadracing’. (I proposed Mike Hailwood because he cross over many 'pavement surface' racing on various bikes.) But if we are gonna talk about “versatility” (what you call "adaptability", then you must come to grips that the American motorcycle champions of the late 70s and all of 80s were extremely versatile in all the motorcycling disciplines). If you can imagine, a course where there was a road section, TT, Flat-track section, MX/SX jumps sections together (if this sounds familiar its because this is where supermoto comes from); then imagine all the champs of the day from MX/SX, Roadracers, and Flat-trackers; racing against eachother. Yes, the likes of King Kenny, Rainey, Lawson, Danny Chandler, Bubba Shobert (heard of him), these names you may not have heard of but are flat-track & MX/SX legend: Broc Glover, Jeff Ward, Rick Johnson, Kent Howerton, Chris Carr, Ricky Graham, Jay Springsteen, TT specialist Alex Jorgensen, and of all these men, perhaps the single most talented and versatile of them all (a name you surely haven't heard of was Steve Wise. Steve Wise won in every motorcycling discipline: TT, Roadracing, Dirt-track, and MX/SX. He won this event twice, against the list of the names above (BTW so did Eddie Lawson).

Of all those names, I’d say Steve Wise & Lawson were the most pure “talented”. But perhaps you have never heard of them since they were American (bad).
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ May 20 2008, 09:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>1. Ok, I'll take that as you unfurling the white flag of "I got nothing." >I accept.

2. I think there is a difference between "adaptability" and "versatility". I think you are using these interchangeably. You made a case that if a person can't win on a different engine configuration, then the rider had poor "adapting" ability, therefore, no "talent". I of course disagreed and showed you some examples of men who are clearly "talented" but had difficulty on new engines to defend their titles.

My point about Hailwood is that among the many aspects of talent, one of which was his “versatility”, which you interpret only as “adapting”. Well then if this is your measure of "talent", then you need to do a little homework. I realize you have a hang up about American racers, so you probably did not know that here in the early 80s (79-85) we had a racing event called "The Superbikers". It combined all the disciplines of motorcycle racing in the AMA: Flat track, Motor/Supercross,TT, Roadracing. Google it if you must, you will learn something and perhaps this way you can make more informed posts to present your "views". All the greats attended, champs from all these 'motorcycling' disciplines, NOT just ‘roadracing’. (I proposed Mike Hailwood because he cross over many 'pavement surface' racing on various bikes.) But if we are gonna talk about “versatility” (what you call "adaptability", then you must come to grips that the American motorcycle champions of the late 70s and all of 80s were extremely versatile in all the motorcycling disciplines). If you can imagine, a course where there was a road section, TT, Flat-track section, MX/SX jumps sections together (if this sounds familiar its because this is where supermoto comes from); then imagine all the champs of the day from MX/SX, Roadracers, and Flat-trackers; racing against eachother. Yes, the likes of King Kenny, Rainey, Lawson, Danny Chandler, Bubba Shobert (heard of him), these names you may not have heard of but are flat-track & MX/SX legend: Broc Glover, Jeff Ward, Rick Johnson, Kent Howerton, Chris Carr, Ricky Graham, Jay Springsteen, TT specialist Alex Jorgensen, and of all these men, perhaps the single most talented and versatile of them all (a name you surely haven't heard of was Steve Wise. Steve Wise won in every motorcycling discipline: TT, Roadracing, Dirt-track, and MX/SX. He won this event twice, against the list of the names above (BTW so did Eddie Lawson).

Of all those names, I’d say Steve Wise & Lawson were the most pure “talented”. But perhaps you have never heard of them since they were American (bad).
We had 'Kick Start' on BBC1 in the 1970's with Peter Purves
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ May 20 2008, 09:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>1. Ok, I'll take that as you unfurling the white flag of "I got nothing." >I accept.

2. I think there is a difference between "adaptability" and "versatility". I think you are using these interchangeably. You made a case that if a person can't win on a different engine configuration, then the rider had poor "adapting" ability, therefore, no "talent". I of course disagreed and showed you some examples of men who are clearly "talented" but had difficulty on new engines to defend their titles.

My point about Hailwood is that among the many aspects of talent, one of which was his “versatility”, which you interpret only as “adapting”. Well then if this is your measure of "talent", then you need to do a little homework. I realize you have a hang up about American racers, so you probably did not know that here in the early 80s (79-85) we had a racing event called "The Superbikers". It combined all the disciplines of motorcycle racing in the AMA: Flat track, Motor/Supercross,TT, Roadracing. Google it if you must, you will learn something and perhaps this way you can make more informed posts to present your "views". All the greats attended, champs from all these 'motorcycling' disciplines, NOT just ‘roadracing’. (I proposed Mike Hailwood because he cross over many 'pavement surface' racing on various bikes.) But if we are gonna talk about “versatility” (what you call "adaptability", then you must come to grips that the American motorcycle champions of the late 70s and all of 80s were extremely versatile in all the motorcycling disciplines). If you can imagine, a course where there was a road section, TT, Flat-track section, MX/SX jumps sections together (if this sounds familiar its because this is where supermoto comes from); then imagine all the champs of the day from MX/SX, Roadracers, and Flat-trackers; racing against eachother. Yes, the likes of King Kenny, Rainey, Lawson, Danny Chandler, Bubba Shobert (heard of him), these names you may not have heard of but are flat-track & MX/SX legend: Broc Glover, Jeff Ward, Rick Johnson, Kent Howerton, Chris Carr, Ricky Graham, Jay Springsteen, TT specialist Alex Jorgensen, and of all these men, perhaps the single most talented and versatile of them all (a name you surely haven't heard of was Steve Wise. Steve Wise won in every motorcycling discipline: TT, Roadracing, Dirt-track, and MX/SX. He won this event twice, against the list of the names above (BTW so did Eddie Lawson).

Of all those names, I’d say Steve Wise & Lawson were the most pure “talented”. But perhaps you have never heard of them since they were American (bad).
I'd recommend watching "On any Sunday" for an extremely good 1971 documentary of the versatility of American racers. There's also an excellent update to the docu from 1999 - revisited.

For torrent users, racing underground links:
On Any Sunday
On Any Sunday Revisited
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (yamaka46 @ May 20 2008, 10:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I'd recommend watching "On any Sunday" for an extremely good 1971 documentary of the versatility of American racers. There's also an excellent update to the docu from 1999 - revisited.

For torrent users, racing underground links:
On Any Sunday
On Any Sunday Revisited
steve mcqueen racing under a pseudonym, hard as .... he was,
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ May 20 2008, 10:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>steve mcqueen racing under a pseudonym, hard as .... he was,
<

Too right. Presume you've seen the excellent vids then.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ May 20 2008, 09:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Of all those names, I’d say Steve Wise & Lawson were the most pure “talented”. But perhaps you have never heard of them since they were American (bad).

You are absolute right Wise was talented and his gift were god given (praise be!)...he was able to adapt his riding style to suit the bike and circuit (halelulla)...but now he has found his true calling and real talent in life and this is bring the sheep to Jesus (can I an amen)!
<


And yes American bad...AMEN!
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MigsAngel @ May 21 2008, 07:42 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>You are absolute right Wise was talented and his gift were god given (praise be!)...he was able to adapt his riding style to suit the bike and circuit (halelulla)...but now he has found his true calling and real talent in life and this is bring the sheep to Jesus (can I an amen)!
<


And yes American bad...AMEN!
<

Your attempt at humor (very poor one at that) to deflect from your inability to carry a point blinds you from seeing the egg on your face. But its ok, good thing I'm here to point it out.


You have made some good points in the past, and I've pointed them out, but on this thread you showed us your ....


I await you saying its just me being "grumpy."
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bikergirl @ May 20 2008, 06:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Now now, don't pick on Jumkie. Even I feel terrible for gorgeous butted Nicky.
dirty girl...
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (l13eaw @ May 20 2008, 06:58 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Ha Ha yes Bikergirl........ well if we are going to lower the tone to eye candy then:

Nicky Hayden, James Toseland are definitely NATURALLY talented. Yummy.

<
Liz
dirty girl 2...
<
 
Having read all of this i'd like to ask if people think riders appear more talented when their achievements come with seemingly less effort?

Whether it be conscious or not I think riders who appear on the surface to try less get credited with being talented. Additionally does anyone think that the more talented riders do find results easier to achieve at a motogp level?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Tom @ May 25 2008, 05:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Having read all of this i'd like to ask if people think riders appear more talented when their achievements come with seemingly less effort?

Whether it be conscious or not I think riders who appear on the surface to try less get credited with being talented. Additionally does anyone think that the more talented riders do find results easier to achieve at a motogp level?

I'm kind of surpriced you even ask the questioin.
It's allways been faster to be smoth. At special occations there is one or another exception, but smothness is the key to be fast and smothnes transform into "easy" and "little effort".
And making it look like that is of course extreemly difficult. You need perfect timing and to be fast and smoth to make it stick. At the very top where these guys are they are all more or less smooth but of course there are differences. And of course. being smoth like biaggi is not nessesarily the fastest way around on a 500 or 990, but that is really about something different, a snoth style, ans sometimes that's not the fastest way, but even whan you do it different you have to be smoth at what you do.

Every racer has also experienced one or more times in their careers that pushing to hard make it look like you go fast but untidy while backing off a bit often make you actually go faster.
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top