No ...., especially after calling Migs on this ........ just in post #6. See below:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Jan 18 2008, 09:10 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Lex, are you kidding me, this is MigsA posts (perhaps you haven't noticed his usual MO of posts regarding Hayden on this site, but you may want to pay more attention)? Dude,
where in the hell does this article imply anything like what MigsA is suggesting here??? This is only MigA creating a rumor out of thin air. Why would you bite on such a fabricated attempt to make something out of nothing? Not even the journalists here tried to sensationalize it with a juicy title to the article as seen on other sites where the title has lnothing to do with what it actually about. This is the quivalent of somebody like Pinky posting a thread after a reporter sees Rossi go into an ice cream store and then post a topic with the tag:
Rossi seen at ice cream store, does he plan to quit MotoGP for new business? Yes, ....... stupid.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MigsAngel @ Jan 18 2008, 12:47 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Is preparing for his 2009 move back to AMA?
You may want to get a job for MCN. You have the talent to make a tag that has zero to do with the actual contents of an article. And by doing so, input a suggestion, and net a few not seeing it for what you are attempting.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (L8Braker @ Jan 21 2008, 06:16 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>damn Migs...good job...you got a lot of bites on this thread.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (frosty58 @ Jan 21 2008, 10:00 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>honestly he did'nt even try that hard. if you read the article. jeeez people will read anything into a simple little journo blurb...
But L8 & Frost, I’m not sure why you are letting Migs off the hooks so easy here. If you read most of the posts, they are NOT naïve “bites” as it seems to me that you two try to portray Migs as
clever (unless you include your two entries as naïve also); but rather calling Migs on his ......... Yes the article had nothing to indicate the rumor Migs fabricated here. And that is precisely the point of many of the posts on this thread, that is, to call Migs on his ......... So why would you try to let the guy off the hook as if he was clever enough to go fishing for responses and got some “bites”??? It wasn’t that at all, but rather the ....... guy actually thought the article was indicating a career move. That’s the ....... joke!!! NOT that he was “fishing for bites” but rather that he started a stupid rumor and most everybody called him on it. He is the joke here, not the guys who called him on it. Do you see the difference?
