All kinds of conspiracies and resentment towards selected riders are inevitable and fun. I believe it's even more fun, though, when they don't completely and irrationally compromise all chances to be even remotely objective and admit flaws and pros of everyone, whether it's Lorenzo's oustanding precision in all corners, Rossi's remarkable adaptability to different tracks, conditions and eras or MM's unmatched ability to put his bike wherever he wants whenever he wants in the bravest looking style.
Personally, no matter how much he'll win from now on, and by no means regretting to admit I'm a Rossi "fan" and some kind of Marquez "hater" (yes, after last season, yes, I'm biased), I also have no problem admitting to find Marc Marquez overall (overall = including Vale's prime in the first 2000's) a more talented rider than Vale, and his style some sort of devilishly crazy never-seen-before revolutionary unique gift.
About last year: several different things have (or have not) happened from Philip Island on. But I SINSIRLY
p) think that no rational person can tell for sure (perhaps not even the three most directly involved) what happened in each moment of each race except someone who wants very much to believe to know everything.