Motogp: 2016 Round 4 Gran Premio Red Bull de España
Help Support MotoGP Forum:
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2016
- Messages
- 1,523
- Location
- FNQ
Thanks for the spoiler.
- Joined
- May 13, 2009
- Messages
- 6,313
- Location
- Shovel's Club
I use one to keep my brush warm.
I'm 90% sure I'm arguing with willski.
Rossi's ....... spaceship!They're waiting for the fog to clear at the circuit. Will probably be delays in warm ups.
Is that 'special mix' concrete?
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 1,793
- Location
- A caravan on an island
Maybe don't read the thread if you haven't seen the race, I certainly wouldn't myself bud.
- Joined
- May 13, 2009
- Messages
- 6,313
- Location
- Shovel's Club
- Joined
- May 13, 2009
- Messages
- 6,313
- Location
- Shovel's Club
Give him Crutchies bike next year, I want to watch that show in gp.
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2016
- Messages
- 118
- Location
- UK
I can't see any valid arguments there sorry. Ad hominem remarks won't get us anywhere. "Mind games" accusations sound vague and implausible in this case. I'm yet to hear a fully developed theory about that. What, specifically, was the "game" about this time?
The fact that MM (just) managed to win the race can be used both as evidence that he was or that he wasn't "playing".
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2007
- Messages
- 9,515
- Location
- Norah Head
Go pedro!
The ad hominem logical fallacy in debate refers to attacking your opponent rather than his argument, not to the subject of the debate, and I am happy to exempt you from the category of those who have praised Valentino over the length of his career for the subtlety, strength and success of his "mind games", a real rather than imaginary category of people as you can't deny, if you don't belong to it.
If I have made an ad hominem attack on VR in any case, what exactly did Valentino do in regard to MM at those pre-Sepang press conferences? You asked for a possible explanation for why Valentino made those accusations, I gave my opinion, which I fully realise is my opinion only and unprovable, unlike you in accepting those accusations, and it would seem likely unlike Valentino in making the accusations.
What is at all open to argument about it being preposterous to maintain a rider tanked a race that he won, btw?
Last edited:
Iannone and Crutchlow running together.... I wonder who will crash first.
Edit: Dovi having some kind of tyre issue and didn't feel safe out there. Are people still going to say that Michelin quality control isn't a problem?
Edit: Dovi having some kind of tyre issue and didn't feel safe out there. Are people still going to say that Michelin quality control isn't a problem?
Obviously an unequivocal great dry win by Valentino, far too good on the day.
He may well be too good for Jorge this year, particularly in races where tyre wear is a factor.
Impressed by MM's new headier approach once again.
He may well be too good for Jorge this year, particularly in races where tyre wear is a factor.
Impressed by MM's new headier approach once again.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 10
- Location
- Germany
Il dottore out of competition 
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2007
- Messages
- 2,708
- Location
- UK
Its seems easy to win when everything is perfect....but when things arent that is where Jorge suffers....much like his mentor Biaggi used to struggle unless everything was perfect...
It is never easy to win a GP race against current opposition, and any such wins whatever the margin should not be dismissed imo, but I don't dispute like pretty much everyone he has probably never been as good as Rossi at preserving tyres or riding on worn tyres
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2015
- Messages
- 812
- Location
- Hurricane, WV
Boy, Rossi laid the snack down... No one else even had a shot. Like one of the announcers said, gave JLo a bit of his own Medicine.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Similar threads
