Kropotkin
3509961368002485
The fail is strong in this one.
Kropotkin
3510161368012390
Jorge Lorenzo speaks:
[Irrelevant]
And Jum just has his tampons in a twist because the 2013 MotoGP World Champion won the first of many races he will win this year.
:lol: Well....I'm not the one who threw up some BS into the virtual ether hoping it would stick or sway opinion, THEN retract it when a few informed people were not buying it.
"Lost the front"? HAHAHAHAHA! Honestly, I don't think that was the worst of your statement, giving you the benefit of the doubt as we always do for
"experts", perhaps that was an
honest mistake.
However, I think the worst was trying to make some point that
"Rider B was past rider A..." to advance your already preposterous points: 1. Marquez had the right of way 2. Lorenzo could have avoided collision by (and believe me, I’m laughing as I type this) ‘brake a little more’ or expected to see Marky there. Both points are so outlandish, where to begin debunking them…
Ok, with all do respect friend:
1. Marquez was ahead momentarily…Well no ...., that is because
Rider B did NOT brake adequately (that is called an
ERROR) (you can thank the laws of physics for what happened next) and figured he would just use
Rider A as a berm. Even if that was not Marc’s intent (as you tried to rationalize, in addition to mind reading), the ERROR resulted in the collision.
2. Lorenzo could have avoided collision…Which according to your
carefully constructed narrative, this happened as a result of <u>Lorenzo & Friends</u> deciding to race professionally, cleanly, and safely—as you put it,
“where riding attitudes have changed to be more respectful.” And
why would that be?! Not that any of these riders (two of which are premier class multi-champions)
had good reason to clean up the on track etiquette toward safety, right? (sarcasm for affect) You disparaged this 'imagined agreement' (unless you are prepared to publish the press release where they sat down to make such a pact) in hopes of
advancing your position that ‘Marquez was not dangerous.’ You said
Lorenzo did not expect anybody to have the
"temerity" to be in that gap (your are overplaying and giving positive connotation to a poorly executed over-ethusiastic braking ERROR). Well, of course he did NOT expect this, that is because riders are expected to brake adequately into turns and follow an appropriate trajectory without causing collision.
You attempt to laud and glorify Moto2 race tactics, yet its here in the
junior categories where riders often make mistakes as would make logical sense. The assumption is once promoted to the post-graduate category, that their skill level has improved and indifference to precarious tactics has been enlightened for awareness of themselves and fellow competitors. Lets follow the natural conclusion of your ill-concieved logic, what next, are you going to
laud and praise the racing tactics of the mini-racers because they are more cut-throat and reckless and have the "temerity" to do "whatever it takes to win"? The ADULTS in the room know this attitude comes from the immaturity of a rider not recognizing the inherent dangers of such tactics, something that has been
missing in the racing education of Marquez, NOT ONLY by the
adults in his crew, but the
adults in race direction who have turned a blind eye, the
adults writing "expert" opinions who are flatering his employment of immature exuberance mistaking it for praiseworthy racing "temerity", the
adult spectators applauding racing mistakes because of the excitement it generates (and that nobody got seriously injured). Then we ask why some of these athletes go out and do some stupid .... on the field of play or in their private lives? Its because of this cavalier attitude that these youngster grow up believing is the reality of life--but its .........
(I tried keeping it brief for your benefit...and since I had to go change my tampon)
