Pedrosa qualified on pole in dry 100 degree conditions, the race was wet. Next
What I like about this comment is that you've repeated it buddy, twice silly. It really does illustrate how depleted you are to make a reasonable response to an absurd point, as if a pole achieved in the dry has never translated into a podium in the wet. You're clutching a straws here brother, and with it .... away lots of your race take credibility to double down on your ridiculous claims that Lorenzo's win was a lock, a guaranteed and that he faked an almost crash to let Dovi by to supposedly follow team orders.
According to Pov logic, Pedrosa's pole performance is meaningless because it was achieved in the DRY, the race was in the rain, add this to the ridiculous takes you've made so far on the subject, you're making yourself look worse. I'll debunk it below, wait for it. I wonder how many serious informed members here would agree that there is no correlation between qualifying and race even when conditions change? Anybody want to align themselves with this take, JP, P4/1, anybody else?
You've repeatedly thrown your support at Pedrosa calling him one of the truly great riders, a deserving factory fixture, and here you throw all that away to advance another untenable position that because qualifying was in different conditions therefore, your silly logic goes, Pedrosa couldn't have challenged for the top positions; except he did! Top 5. None the less Pedrosa came exactly one position away from Marquez! Marquez finished 4th, Pedrosa finished 5th.
There are many examples of qualifying conditions different to race, in fact it's never the exact conditions, wet dry, or otherwise. Here you've repeated the disinformed (as opposed to misinformed, there is a difference) that because qual was dry race wet there can NOT be any meaningful correlation to a rider's performance carried over from qualifying to race, yet it's usually the RULE not the exception! The top qualifiers are almost always the top finishers in the race, rain or shine genius.
Now Pov, you'll need to defend the notion that qualifying position and race position when done in different conditions does not correlate. According to Pov, there is no relationship between qualifying dry and wet race performance.
Let's test Povol's claim:
Qualifying DRY:
PEDROSA, ZARCO, DOVI, ROSSI, Vinalez, LORENZO, MARQUEZ
Race WET:
DOVI, LORENZO, ZARCO, MARQUEZ, PEDROSA, Petrucci, ROSSI
That's weird Povol, 6 of the top 7 race positions were exactly in the top 7 qualifying positions, only Viñalez and Petrucci were not on both lists.
So Pov, your silly point that Pedrosa's pole position couldn't possibly be relevant to race finishing order is as ABSURD as your silly claim that Lorenzo pulled over from a "guaranteed win" faking a near crash to follow team orders. Looks like there equal "evidence " that Pedrosa indeed rode shotgun (or .....) to Marc Marquez.
If you live in a glass house don't throw rocks.