<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GeePee @ Jul 19 2008, 10:25 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Try using stats rather spouting your opinion as fact
2005 250cc Pedrossa 8 wins Stoner 5 wins.
They're the stats.
Casey also had 2 DNF's & a close 2nd to Pedrossa
Hardly wiping the floor.
Rossi had 11 wins in the top class in 2005
Thats wiping the floor
2007 Stoner 10 wins Pedrossa 2 wins
Thats wiping the floor.
nice to see someone throw in facts / logic, instead of emotion. thanks geepee! gotta love the detractors though. i'm starting to wonder if it's a bunch of women posting on this board!
seriously though, as andy roo said, stoner was close to pedroa, but didn't have near the bike as pedroas had. pedrosa has had full factory support, and as most have suggested around here, gotten the red carpet whereever he has gone. even now. hell, its even argued that the serious was changed just for him. (i disagree with this theory). IMHO the serious was changed because honda thought they had the upper hand in R&D. the 5 v rc2IIV ... if you drop a valve what do you have? 800cc. they figure right out of the bat, they had a bad ... engine that would domiate the series for awhile. boy where they wrong!
(sometimes going back to the drawing board and re-engineer from scratch has its benefits. eh ducati?)
funny how though, when it comes to talking about stoner, all of a sudden all of the facts are forgotten, and whatever "consipiracy theory" sounds good at the time, comes to fruition!