- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
- Messages
- 24,726
- Location
- Your Mom's House
Thanks for the link Povol.
I don't think it would spell doom like this guy describes. Actually, it smacks of sensationalism a bit. The guy says Kawasaki would dwarf Dorna in court, but yet they are in cost savings mode. Only pride would create a situation where they aimed to “crush” Dorna as he says, and Kawasaki, if they had pride, would spend that money on fielding a team. I doubt they are interested spending more money; they are trying to get out of doing that is the case. I'm sure if it came to court there would be some settlement. Also, about the damaged to relationships and other teams willing to make contracts, I doubt much would come of it. The fact is companies enter into contracts with each other all the time, and they do so for mutual benefit. Kawasaki is bound by contract and they just simply want to get out of it. Sure they may have good reason, but then again, as this guy said, they are a multibillion dollar company, so why not try to reach some compromise? It’s a give and take and both parties need to come up with a solution. I actually think what Ezy is proposing is reasonable; though its just a quick fix and desperation on his part to have a barely satisfactory field this year in hopes of buying time for a better solution next year.
I don't think it would spell doom like this guy describes. Actually, it smacks of sensationalism a bit. The guy says Kawasaki would dwarf Dorna in court, but yet they are in cost savings mode. Only pride would create a situation where they aimed to “crush” Dorna as he says, and Kawasaki, if they had pride, would spend that money on fielding a team. I doubt they are interested spending more money; they are trying to get out of doing that is the case. I'm sure if it came to court there would be some settlement. Also, about the damaged to relationships and other teams willing to make contracts, I doubt much would come of it. The fact is companies enter into contracts with each other all the time, and they do so for mutual benefit. Kawasaki is bound by contract and they just simply want to get out of it. Sure they may have good reason, but then again, as this guy said, they are a multibillion dollar company, so why not try to reach some compromise? It’s a give and take and both parties need to come up with a solution. I actually think what Ezy is proposing is reasonable; though its just a quick fix and desperation on his part to have a barely satisfactory field this year in hopes of buying time for a better solution next year.