Jerez predictions

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Goatboy @ Mar 19 2008, 05:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>1. Pedrosack
2. Lorenzoo
3. Dovina

I like it
<
This could be my screen name in my afterlife.
<
<
 
1. Rossi (please!)
2. Stoner
3. Lorenzo

And Bati will win 250cc, hopefully...
<
 
1. Rossi
2. Dovizioso
3. Stoner

4. Pedrosa
5. Lorenzo
6. Toseland
7. De Puniet (barring no crashes)
8. Edwards
9. Hayden
10. Caparossi
11. Vermulen
12. Hopkins
13. De angelis (barring no crashes)
14. Melandri
15. Nakano
16. Elias (barring no crashes)
17. Guintoli
18. West

Lorenzo is overrated. He would never have a title to his name if Dovizioso wasn't so loyal to Honda. Dovi had a bike that wasn't developed and he barely lost to Lorenzo on a better machine in 2006. In 2007 the the Honda was untouched and the Aprilia imroved even further so Lorenzo won by a little more. They are equal in the dry I'll give Lorenzo credit, he's fast. But sprinkle a little water on the track and he's done, as to where Dovi wins races in the wet. Dovi to me has better race craft. He can take different lines and you can watch him set up passes laps ahead. Lorenzo better win a title this year because if Dovi gets a factory ride I doubt he will ever win one. Of course they both have to beat Casey first. Toseland is a pretty complete rider himself, I think he will do well, maybe better then Lorenzo, but he is older and I wonder how much better he will get. I also don't think he has the pure talent of Dovizioso. De Angelis must have been picked out of desperation, there was nobody else left to pick lol.

Speaking of Casey, this kid is in the zone. Call it traction control, the bike or the tires it doesn't matter. The package is working and and he has shown consistency like nobody else. Plus he has shown the ability to take different lines like only a few other riders can. He will be very, very tough to beat for a long time barring any sudden rule changes.

Rossi is still the best pure rider in the world. Yes Casey is beating him but I believe Casey just found the perfect package for himself. Rossi can throw his leg over anything and go fast. He will fight for a title this year and may get it. Quatar was just a bogey track. A few riders struggled there under the abnormal conditions.

I like Hayden, he's a good guy and a talented rider. But I really don't think the bike's suit his style anymore with less torque and more electronics. I think it showed a lot that he was able to step up to the podium several times last year and his work ethics are second to none. But I really hope he goes to SBK's. He would kick butt over there and he deserves to stand on the top step....somewhere.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (projekZERO @ Mar 21 2008, 09:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Quatar was just a bogey track. A few riders struggled there under the abnormal conditions.

yes there seemed to be a lot of that going round, in 07 there were about 13 "bogey tracks" wasn't there
<
<


I'd have to differ with you on the Rossi is the best pure rider out there bit for the following reasons:

Rossi's on the best bike and has been for years ( Lorenzo steping in has shown that ) so really its been a bit od a giveaway for him.

Rossi is the king of TC he has had it longer than anyone else out there, indeed he is the guy on the Mag. Marelli website!! Take TC off a bike and he would be nowhere one would assume.

Rossi has had the best tires, as as been displayed by the fact that only Stoner can win, even on Bridgestones.

In several straight up "pure races" since Stoner came into MGP he has won and his record surpasses Rossi for that time period.

Rossi was ranked 3rd in the world and in a year when 3rd, and indeed 2nd, was a looong way off pace.

Rossi's last few races ( late 07-08 ) has shown him to be at best a top of midpack rider.

Toseland on a satellite Yamaha matches Rossi in his first ever race.

Lorenzo in his forst ever race creams Rossi

Rossi uses political pressure to get gains that help him ( unfortunately it seems to have backfired with the going Bridgestones ploy
<
)

Rossi is good at getting in front and holding others behind him ..... The newer guys dn't seem to understand this hence they have been going past him whilst he creates a new "pack" ( and "real race"
<
<
<
) down where the midpack stuff starts.

Rossi employs desparate measures to compete ... eg. Run Qualies ( or very very soft tyres ) to get in front and possibly hold of the toher riders.

Doviziosa on a second rate Honda had his measure. And Dovi. is a Rookie.

Rossi imagines things are wrong with his bike to cover up his own shortcomings.

Rossi has in the past employed pressure within his team to ensure that the riders hired to ride with him are not going to show him up.



Theres lots of reasons why Rossi is not the best "pure rider" those are just a few.

<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Mar 20 2008, 09:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>yes there seemed to be a lot of that going round, in 07 there were about 13 "bogey tracks" wasn't there
<
<


I'd have to differ with you on the Rossi is the best pure rider out there bit for the following reasons:

Rossi's on the best bike and has been for years ( Lorenzo steping in has shown that ) so really its been a bit od a giveaway for him.

Rossi is the king of TC he has had it longer than anyone else out there, indeed he is the guy on the Mag. Marelli website!! Take TC off a bike and he would be nowhere one would assume.

Rossi has had the best tires, as as been displayed by the fact that only Stoner can win, even on Bridgestones.

In several straight up "pure races" since Stoner came into MGP he has won and his record surpasses Rossi for that time period.

Rossi was ranked 3rd in the world and in a year when 3rd, and indeed 2nd, was a looong way off pace.

Rossi's last few races ( late 07-08 ) has shown him to be at best a top of midpack rider.

Toseland on a satellite Yamaha matches Rossi in his first ever race.

Lorenzo in his forst ever race creams Rossi

Rossi uses political pressure to get gains that help him ( unfortunately it seems to have backfired with the going Bridgestones ploy
<
)

Rossi is good at getting in front and holding others behind him ..... The newer guys dn't seem to understand this hence they have been going past him whilst he creates a new "pack" ( and "real race"
<
<
<
) down where the midpack stuff starts.

Rossi employs desparate measures to compete ... eg. Run Qualies ( or very very soft tyres ) to get in front and possibly hold of the toher riders.

Doviziosa on a second rate Honda had his measure. And Dovi. is a Rookie.

Rossi imagines things are wrong with his bike to cover up his own shortcomings.

Rossi has in the past employed pressure within his team to ensure that the riders hired to ride with him are not going to show him up.



Theres lots of reasons why Rossi is not the best "pure rider" those are just a few.

<



Barry
I could spend my life in eternity trying to come up with 1 reason why Rossi isn't the best pure rider ever and still come up short.
If you came up with 1 reason why Rossi is not the best pure rider ever I could maybe debate it but you have 12 reasons.
You said those are just a few. Can you please come up with more because I am really enjoying watching you throw away any credibility your might have ever had.

BTW I'm not even a Rossi Fan
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Mar 20 2008, 06:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>yes there seemed to be a lot of that going round, in 07 there were about 13 "bogey tracks" wasn't there
<
<


I'd have to differ with you on the Rossi is the best pure rider out there bit for the following reasons:

Rossi's on the best bike and has been for years ( Lorenzo steping in has shown that ) so really its been a bit od a giveaway for him.

Rossi is the king of TC he has had it longer than anyone else out there, indeed he is the guy on the Mag. Marelli website!! Take TC off a bike and he would be nowhere one would assume.

Rossi has had the best tires, as as been displayed by the fact that only Stoner can win, even on Bridgestones.

In several straight up "pure races" since Stoner came into MGP he has won and his record surpasses Rossi for that time period.

Rossi was ranked 3rd in the world and in a year when 3rd, and indeed 2nd, was a looong way off pace.

Rossi's last few races ( late 07-08 ) has shown him to be at best a top of midpack rider.

Toseland on a satellite Yamaha matches Rossi in his first ever race.

Lorenzo in his forst ever race creams Rossi

Rossi uses political pressure to get gains that help him ( unfortunately it seems to have backfired with the going Bridgestones ploy
<
)

Rossi is good at getting in front and holding others behind him ..... The newer guys dn't seem to understand this hence they have been going past him whilst he creates a new "pack" ( and "real race"
<
<
<
) down where the midpack stuff starts.

Rossi employs desparate measures to compete ... eg. Run Qualies ( or very very soft tyres ) to get in front and possibly hold of the toher riders.

Doviziosa on a second rate Honda had his measure. And Dovi. is a Rookie.

Rossi imagines things are wrong with his bike to cover up his own shortcomings.

Rossi has in the past employed pressure within his team to ensure that the riders hired to ride with him are not going to show him up.



Theres lots of reasons why Rossi is not the best "pure rider" those are just a few.

<

I'm not Rossi fan, I'm not a Stoner hater.

First, Did Rossi have the best bike in 04? He still won though didn't he?

Rossi uses very little traction control from what I hear, much less than most. Maybe you have another source?

So what if a racer holds up other rider. Why would you not want to qualify in a good position and be out front? its a race, thats racing, the point is to finish first, and he does. That point you made makes no sense at all.

Melandri complains about the bike or tires when he doesn't win, so does Stoner, and Pedrosa, so whats your point? Hayden is the only rider who always says the TEAM didn't have it right. Which is what makes him such a likeable guy.

I don't think Rossi coming in 3rd last year discredits him. Yes the yamaha was slower in the straights, yes the michelins had a few more tracks then the bridgstones where they opperating temps werenpt right. But even had they been on an equal playing field like this year, I don't know he would have beat Stoner. I do think it would have been much closer though. Perhaps you ride a motorcycle, perhaps you even race. You have to understand its about feeling with a bike. You may not feel comfortable on a bike even though its the "fastest" bike out there and you may go faster on a different bike because you like the way it feels. Stoner just works with the Ducati, they work perfectly together.

I think in Quatar the bridgstones struggled the most, as testing at other tracks showed the bridgestones with an advantage, and Quatar was obviously a michelin track. So of course Dovi, lorenzo and toseland did well. I know Stoner won but I feel his team has a better understanding of the tires and also because he uses so much traction control it allows him to maintain his tires over the race better then others. I don't feel its the tires or top speed that makes Stoner so great at the moment, I believe the TC is what really seperates him. With tire wear, race longevity, and his rain performance (not that he isn't already good in the wet).

Stoner has had a great start to his motogp career no doubt. However he didn't win a race his rookie year and he also never won a 125 or 250 title. So he has proven he can't win on any bike. Rossi has won on every bike he's ever kicked a leg over except the 800 yamaha (so far). So regardless of what you say at this point, that fact alone backs my opinion.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JohnnyKnockdown @ Mar 20 2008, 06:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Barry
I could spend my life in eternity trying to come up with 1 reason why Rossi isn't the best pure rider ever and still come up short.
If you came up with 1 reason why Rossi is not the best pure rider ever I could maybe debate it but you have 12 reasons.
You said those are just a few. Can you please come up with more because I am really enjoying watching you <u>throw away any credibility your might have ever had</u>.

BTW I'm not even a Rossi Fan
Too late.

Harry’s relentless blind praising of Stoner at Rossi’s expense has quickly evaporated any objectivity he may have had, so again, too late.

I myself (with one arm tied behind my back) could write a dissertation and make a case for Rossi's extraordinary career and present ability. But then the Rossi fans would get all cuddly with me, and I don't want that. Suffice it to say, Rossi is pretty pretty goood at his craft.
<


<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Mar 20 2008, 06:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Rossi is the king of TC ...Take TC off a bike and he would be nowhere one would assume.

Rossi has had the best tires...
These are my favorites. Am I the only one that sees the glaring irony here? (Some might use the word hypocrisy). These two reasons almost brought me to tears of laughter. Dude, do you realize that these were the very same exact reasons, almost verbatim, the words you defended against people who claimed this about Stoner? Now here you make the very same claim and simply inserted Rossi's name. Wow. Breathtaking.


Come on Barry. I have spent countless posts praising Stoner and turning away his detractors, but you are getting ridiculous.
 
The 2007 yamaha was not the best bike, the ducati was at least potentially.

I think the power with the race fuel restrictions and in particular the acceleration consequent on this are the ducati's main advantage. This appears to require casey stoner to be taken advantage of. How much tc contributes to this I don't think we know. It seems a reasonable theory that the ducati tc is better, but it is a theory, and if it is a correct theory I don't know why others haven't been able to match what is presumably a software advantage after a whole season.

I also don't accept that tc uniquely advantages casey stoner, but not any other rider whether great, good mediocre or bad.

As for stoner not performing well on other bikes, if it is argued that he is doing well now because of a superior bike, the obvious corollary is that he may have done less well previously due to less good bikes. Admittedly the 2005 aprilia seemed like a good bike; he actually did do fairly well on it, and may have improved since then as people do in many sports between the ages of 19 and 22.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (projekZERO @ Mar 20 2008, 07:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I'm not Rossi fan, I'm not a Stoner hater.
........
............
.................
So regardless of what you say at this point, that fact alone backs my opinion.
Wow, I'm impressed. Like I said, welcome to the forum. We need more members like you. Great post. Fair and balanced.

I am neither a Rossi fan nor a Stoner hater. (Though I have spent more time praising and defending Stoner in this case, I've been characterised as a Rossi basher at times) but I agree with many of your points.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Babelfish @ Mar 20 2008, 10:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Don't forget Hayden fans Barry.
Well even though you have very poor debating skills, at least you have a wee bit of a sense of humor.
<
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (somedamnwriter @ Mar 19 2008, 05:40 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>best if we just ignore him/her guys. he got the attention he wanted.

on with the topic, shall we?
<

Ooops sorry SDR. I just had to respond to a few posts here, but, I'll stick to my opinions on other threads.

Out.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Mar 21 2008, 12:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Ooops sorry SDR. I just had to respond to a few posts here, but, I'll stick to my opinions on other threads.

Out.

i was referring to the post made by Dirty(something) about pedrosa, and the subsequent responses.

and btw, rog and baldy all getting cuddly with you...oh please, continue your rossi bashing
<
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (somedamnwriter @ Mar 20 2008, 09:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>i was referring to the post made by Dirty(something) about pedrosa, and the subsequent responses.

and btw, rog and baldy all getting cuddly with you...oh please, continue your rossi bashing
<
<

Oh ok. So then I'll add one more thing then...


<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (projekZERO @ Mar 20 2008, 08:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Stoner has had a great start to his motogp career no doubt. However he didn't win a race his rookie year and he also never won a 125 or 250 title. So he has proven he can't win on any bike. Rossi has won on every bike he's ever kicked a leg over except the 800 yamaha (so far). So regardless of what you say at this point, that fact alone backs my opinion.
Well if the question is "best pure rider" then there can be NO doubt. As I understand this "best pure rider" to mean a versatility to be successful over time and on various machines. Its really NOT even a contest. The versatility and success that Rossi has shown is unpresidented and unmatched in the last 15 years. Really, the debate ends here.

One correction however, he HAS won on the 800s, more than anybody on a Japanese bike at the moment (which again further cements his credentials as the "best pure rider" currently.. He just hasn't won a title on it.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (JohnnyKnockdown @ Mar 21 2008, 01:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I am really enjoying watching you throw away any credibility your might have ever had.

Credibility is saught, and judged for success, by ourselves to a fair extent.
<


Thats pretty obvious from lots that gets said on this site...... and its part of life in general
<
<


Debate the points ...... its more credible to me ... not whether you could or could not come up with a reason
<
<


At least Projek has come back with something for me to think about ....

I may not agree with his arguments but at least he has the conviction that it would take to produce a an argument that may show me the error of my ways
<




oh and welcome to the forum by the way Projek ......

you are now "up to speed" with some of the debates we have had in the recent past and the season just gone by
<
<
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Mar 20 2008, 10:34 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>I may not agree with his arguments but at least he has the conviction that it would take to produce a an argument that may show me the error of my ways
<

<
Hahahaha

Well Barry, if I thought it would help, I would have put forth a detailed and comprehensive essay. But I'm afraid; it might just be a waste of my time. As such we all seem dead locked in our ways on this site (I'm guilty too). But hey, you give me hope in at least conceding that perhaps, just perhaps, you may see an “error in your ways.”
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Mar 21 2008, 04:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>
<
Hahahaha

Well Barry, if I thought it would help, I would have put forth a detailed and comprehensive essay. But I'm afraid; it might just be a waste of my time. As such we all seem dead locked in our ways on this site (I'm guilty too). But hey, you give me hope in at least conceding that perhaps, just perhaps, you may see an “error in your ways.”
<



Well isn't that what arguments are about after all?

folk showing me the error of my ways ( as they see it ), and me being ignorant
<
<
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BarryMachine @ Mar 20 2008, 11:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Well isn't that what arguments are about after all?

folk showing me the error of my ways ( as they see it ), and me being ignorant
<
<

Oh Lord, I can see the Rossi fans now lining up.
<
 

Recent Discussions

Back
Top