Jeremy Burgess - Life After Rossi

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Sep 3, 2016
Messages
372
Location
Kroposphere
Life After Rossi

Legendary Grand Prix crew chief Jeremy Burgess speaks about the circumstances behind his sudden departure from the MotoGP paddock and what he’s got planned for 2014 and beyond.
By Hamish Cooper

The four-hour drive from Valencia to Barcelona gives a man plenty of time to put 34 years of his life back into perspective.

As Jeremy Burgess powered along the Spanish toll-road alone in his rental Renault Megane on November 11, 2013, he quietly analysed the tumultuous events of the past few days.

“This wasn’t quite how I’d envisaged leaving Europe,” he says a few months later, sipping a Cooper’s Pale Ale beer in a quiet corner of his local pub in the hills behind Adelaide.

“I’d been preparing mentally for my retirement for years and have said before never to fear the moment because we all know from the first day we walk into a job that one day we’ll walk out for good.”

However, it was an enforced retirement for a man who first went to Europe on a whim in 1980 “to see the world”, then became an integral part of one of Grand Prix racing’s most successful teams.

The ink had only just dried on a Burgess one-year contract with Yamaha for 2014 when Valentino Rossi sacked him as crew chief.

Rather than attending the post-race testing sessions for season 2014 he was on his way to catch a final flight back to Australia, closing the curtain on his amazingly long career on the world stage of motorcycle racing.


Relaxed and Philosophical
“To me, as much as I wouldn’t have made such a call, the fact that the call has been made leaves me very much at ease,” Burgess says. “Having the one-year contract continue is not a bad thing. The more I get used to it (a year on full pay with no immediate responsibility) the more comfortable I become about it all.”

MotoGP’s final round at Valencia caught the motorcycle world’s imagination. Spanish teenager Marc Marquez was poised to become an unlikely world champion in his rookie year. Wily defending champion Jorge Lorenzo was planning a desperate last-ditch defence. But the big news was MotoGP folk hero Valentino Rossi’s very public divorce from “JB”, the straight-shooting crew chief who had guided him to seven of his nine world championship titles.

From the outside it seemed like a spur-of-the-moment decision handled in an embarrassingly clumsy way – Burgess sees it differently.

“Certainly I was blindsided by the timing of the decision, as I said at the time, but there was a basic difference between the way Valentino and I intended to continue on in MotoGP,” he says.

He was keen to continue to perhaps 2016-2017 and we discussed this but I was not prepared to commit so far ahead.

“I was more than happy with a year-by-year contract so he probably felt a lack of commitment. I thought that, for me, it was the honest way to go forward.”

Rumours had been swirling around the Italian media in the lead-up to Valencia, forcing Rossi into making the announcement nobody wanted to believe on the Thursday before the race. Surely that made the last MotoGP a bitter-sweet occasion for Burgess?

“Not at all,” he says. “It would have been terrible to have run that last race and then had Valentino call me aside and say, ‘thanks, but I’ll see you later’.”

Burgess says he called the press conference after Rossi’s Thursday’s statement to clear the air.

“I didn’t want a trail of reporters tapping on the back of the shed all weekend to get my side of things,” he says.

That left Burgess free to concentrate on his last race with Rossi. Sadly, it pretty much summed up the season.

“When Lorenzo slowed the race down I hoped Valentino would be able to seize the chance and add another dimension by providing Marquez with a challenge he wasn’t expecting,” says Burgess.

But Rossi was unable to help his team-mate defend his points tally and remained stuck in a tight little group of Honda Gresini’s Alvaro Bautista and Marquez’s Honda team-mate Dani Pedrosa.

When Pedrosa dispatched Rossi and Bautista, Lorenzo realised he was on his own and no-one could stop Marquez cruising to a world title as the youngest-ever champion and the first rookie winner since Kenny Roberts in 1978.


Winning Above All Else
Burgess elaborates on another major difference that has developed between him and Rossi.

Valentino loves the whole process of going racing and enjoys the riding almost as much as winning,” he says.

“To me it’s all about winning so to stay there in MotoGP to go through that experience of not winning is a vastly different world to what I’ve lived in for the past 34 years.

My attitude has always been if you are not going to win stay home. During our time with Ducati I often felt we weren’t even in the same race as the top three.

“A lot of European MotoGP technicians consider racing is a job but to me and all the Aussies I know who work over there the motivation is winning.

“If I just wanted to be involved in racing I wouldn’t have to leave South Australia. I could go out to Mallala and watch a rider go around in a local event. The skills level might be different but it all equals itself out and even at a lower level than MotoGP it’s still great racing to watch.

“No, there are a lot of people who race and enjoy it but for me it’s all about winning.”
 
Last edited:
You should ask yourself that, but I know you wont so allow me. What was the point of your useless response to JKant's post?

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

It appears his point was to ask what Kant's point was as the man didn't bother to add his own color commentary. Just a thought.
 
I didn't know why Burgess and Rossi parted ways, especially considering that Rossi was all about family and loyalty. Whatever else may be going on in the paddock, he's stuck by his team and they've stuck by him.

Started reading up and came across this interview which seemed to suggest that Burgess had lost a bit of faith in Rossi and wasn't really looking forward to a long term commitment.

I found the piece interesting and thought I'd share it for those who hadn't seen it.

Wasn't trying to make a point.
 
.....
I found the piece interesting and thought I'd share it for those who hadn't seen it.

Wasn't trying to make a point.
What? No agenda? Is that allowed?

In hindsight, it seems Rossi made a correct change for him. What Burgess's real state was, is very difficult to know, since he will be like most humans, and cover his emotions and the reasons for the change, if not positive to himself. Getting a year severance pay, certainly could ease the pain. History: He and Rossi were way too confident (edit: arrogant) when going to Ducati.
 
I didn't know why Burgess and Rossi parted ways, especially considering that Rossi was all about family and loyalty. Whatever else may be going on in the paddock, he's stuck by his team and they've stuck by him.

Started reading up and came across this interview which seemed to suggest that Burgess had lost a bit of faith in Rossi and wasn't really looking forward to a long term commitment.

I found the piece interesting and thought I'd share it for those who hadn't seen it.

Wasn't trying to make a point.

You can't be serious! Rossi chucked Burgess out like day-old trash. Loyalty my ....
 
What? No agenda? Is that allowed?

In hindsight, it seems Rossi made a correct change for him. What Burgess's real state was, is very difficult to know, since he will be like most humans, and cover his emotions and the reasons for the change, if not positive to himself. Getting a year severance pay, certainly could ease the pain. History: He and Rossi were way too confident (edit: arrogant) when going to Ducati.

Rossi - for sure.

I think Burgess probably knew better but given that Rossi had made the disastrous decision - Burgess put on a brave face so as not to seem to publicly undermine Rossi's confidence. I strongly suspect he knew having Rossi on the Ducati was putting lipstick on a pig.
 
You can't be serious! Rossi chucked Burgess out like day-old trash. Loyalty my ....

Honda, Yamaha, Ducati, Yamaha. Michelin, Bridgestone, Michelin. Burgess, Pressiosi whatever the new guy with the bright glasses?

Loyalty does not appear to be his forte.

My understanding was the entire team knew at his age Rossi's work ethic or lack thereof wasn't going to cut it against the new wave of competition. Rossi was as usual blaming the bike claiming Lorenzo was getting a better set up. Basically he was 'doing a Biaggi'.

Someone was going to have to play devils advocate and set him straight. Burgess did it, sat Rossi down, said its not the bike its you. Your too old, you don't train, late nights out partying with Uccio. The others are training their ... off, get serious or retire.

Naturally Rossi was insulted and later fired Burgess. But it worked because to prove Burgess wrong Rossi trained harder than he ever has and was far more competitive. Unlike the bopper posters ala Talps who quickly pointed "see it was right for Rossi to fire Burgess all he needed was a better crew chief" the truth was all he needed was a kick up the butt but ego and all didn't allow that.
 
You can't be serious! Rossi chucked Burgess out like day-old trash. Loyalty my ....
If your crew chief with whom you took seven titles doesn't have faith in you and thinks you're washed-up racer (as I'm sure many on the forum did in 2013), just what do you expect? Rossi wanted a long term commitment, Burgess did not.


"there was a basic difference between the way Valentino and I intended to continue on in MotoGP. He was keen to continue to perhaps 2016-2017 and we discussed this but I was not prepared to commit so far ahead."

"Valentino loves the whole process of going racing and enjoys the riding almost as much as winning. My attitude has always been if you are not going to win stay home."
 
My understanding was the entire team knew at his age Rossi's work ethic or lack thereof wasn't going to cut it against the new wave of competition. Rossi was as usual blaming the bike claiming Lorenzo was getting a better set up. Basically he was 'doing a Biaggi'.

Someone was going to have to play devils advocate and set him straight. Burgess did it, sat Rossi down, said its not the bike its you. Your too old, you don't train, late nights out partying with Uccio. The others are training their ... off, get serious or retire.

Naturally Rossi was insulted and later fired Burgess. But it worked because to prove Burgess wrong Rossi trained harder than he ever has and was far more competitive.
That appears to be a very detailed description of what went down. Can I ask where you read it or who narrated it to you?
 
You should ask yourself that, but I know you wont so allow me. What was the point of your useless response to JKant's post?

This was in the context of a concurrent discussion on another thread about Rossi having discarded Burgess with extreme prejudice. I actually said on that other thread that Burgess appeared to have lost faith in Rossi, and also said on that thread as I have said on many previous occasions that in the circumstances ie Rossi wanting to continue, particularly for a number of years as has proved to be the case, then it was reasonable for him to look for a new crew chief.

My reply to JKant was intended to be to the effect that a selected interview for public consumption at the time of JB's retirement might not necessarily mean that all was amicable or that Rossi terminated their relationship of many years in a particularly classy fashion; not all Australians are as blunt as Casey Stoner. There are Australian posters on here (not me personally) who have close connections with the Australian bike racing scene and might know more about how JB really felt; in particular if Birdman says something from an Australian angle, as with Gaz I am inclined to believe him, as he has very often been correct both about matters Australian and things in general.

One thing I can say definitely is that JB had grave reservations about Ducati, because I heard him express them live on Australian TV as a guest on the Australian coverage of one of the GPs during Valentino's absence with injury/the compound lower leg fracture in 2010.
 
If your crew chief with whom you took seven titles doesn't have faith in you and thinks you're washed-up racer (as I'm sure many on the forum did in 2013), just what do you expect? Rossi wanted a long term commitment, Burgess did not.


"there was a basic difference between the way Valentino and I intended to continue on in MotoGP. He was keen to continue to perhaps 2016-2017 and we discussed this but I was not prepared to commit so far ahead."

"Valentino loves the whole process of going racing and enjoys the riding almost as much as winning. My attitude has always been if you are not going to win stay home."

We'll never know the specifics of their talks. In any event - giving Burgess the boot, was not what put Rossi back in the mix. It was calling an end to his stupid misadventure and crawling back to Yamaha.
 
We'll never know the specifics of their talks. In any event - giving Burgess the boot, was not what put Rossi back in the mix. It was calling an end to his stupid misadventure and crawling back to Yamaha.
I never suggested that giving Burgess the boot put Rossi back in the mix.

I said Burgess losing faith in Rossi is what led them to part ways, something that is clearly indicated by him in his interview.

And this is after Rossi's first year back on the M1, where he finished in 4th place, 65 pts off Pedrosa in 3rd, with only one race win to show for it all.

Its understandable. Very few people could have foreseen his resurgence at his age or imagined that he'd be a serious title contender in 2017. To most people then he was akin to the Pedrosa of today except for his records. Including Burgess apparently.
 
I never suggested that giving Burgess the boot put Rossi back in the mix.

I said Burgess losing faith in Rossi is what led them to part ways, something that is clearly indicated by him in his interview.

And this is after Rossi's first year back on the M1, where he finished in 4th place, 65 pts off Pedrosa in 3rd, with only one race win to show for it all.

Its understandable. Very few people could have foreseen his resurgence at his age or imagined that he'd be a serious title contender in 2017. To most people then he was akin to the Pedrosa of today except for his records. Including Burgess apparently.



It was inevitable that Rossi would need to acclimatise to riding the M1 again after two years on the Ducati, just like Lorenzo will need a learning year on the Ducati.
As a matter of fact, Lorenzo was one of the few who refused to kick Rossi when he was down, whilst journalists ran polls amongst riders and ex riders to see if they thought Rossi was done.
I wonder if Rossi will return the favour if Lorenzo goes on to struggle on the Ducati?...
 
Honda, Yamaha, Ducati, Yamaha. Michelin, Bridgestone, Michelin. Burgess, Pressiosi whatever the new guy with the bright glasses?

Loyalty does not appear to be his forte.

My understanding was the entire team knew at his age Rossi's work ethic or lack thereof wasn't going to cut it against the new wave of competition. Rossi was as usual blaming the bike claiming Lorenzo was getting a better set up. Basically he was 'doing a Biaggi'.

Someone was going to have to play devils advocate and set him straight. Burgess did it, sat Rossi down, said its not the bike its you. Your too old, you don't train, late nights out partying with Uccio. The others are training their ... off, get serious or retire.

Naturally Rossi was insulted and later fired Burgess. But it worked because to prove Burgess wrong Rossi trained harder than he ever has and was far more competitive. Unlike the bopper posters ala Talps who quickly pointed "see it was right for Rossi to fire Burgess all he needed was a better crew chief" the truth was all he needed was a kick up the butt but ego and all didn't allow that.
Agree, at that point in his career, he was not committed to the grind of getting in shape to win. Since making that commitment, he has become more competitive. With that being said, the fly aways at the end of the season seem to wear on him these days, then having his Waterloo track to end the championship season almost guarantees he will not win another title unless everything falls his way.
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top