Hot News - Tech 3 sign Checa!!

BEN

Joined Sep 2005

4K Posts | 3+

Lancashire UK

Discussion Starter
• Jan 31, 2006

• #1

News just in!

http://www.motogpforum.com/index.php?id=81

Nice to see Carlos getting a ride

 

L

Le_ShAkEy

Joined Sep 2005

282 Posts | 0+

Brixham & Dartmouth, Devon

• Jan 31, 2006

• #2

Can only be good for Ellison!
Come on James, beat the Chucca!!!

 

R

richo

Joined Dec 2005

4K Posts | 0+

• Jan 31, 2006

• #3

Not gonna happen, Shakey. Checa's too good.
Good article ben, didn't know Checa had been around that long. And those pics

He's a beefy sonofabitch, ain't he?
So is Dunlop actually sponsoring Tech 3, or just giving them rubber?

 

C

Captain Snow

Joined Aug 2005

1K Posts | 0+

USA

• Jan 31, 2006

• #4

Both.

 

T

teomolca

Joined Jun 2005

3K Posts | 0+

Valencia, Spain

• Jan 31, 2006

• #5

Good news for Checa though being on Dunlops it's gonna hurt him. Anyway that's much better than nothing !

 

Austin

Joined Mar 2005

7K Posts | 20+

Woody Creek

• Jan 31, 2006

• #6

Mat Mladin seems to think that Dunlop tires are very capable and just need a solid rider in GPs to prove it. Carlos Checa is a consistent top 10 rider so if he can't do it on the 'Lops then there is no saving them.

 

R

rossi 46 winner

Joined Apr 2005

957 Posts | 0+

northants

• Jan 31, 2006

• #7

i said hed go back

 

T

The Doctor

Joined Jul 2005

954 Posts | 9+

Philadelphia-suburbs

• Jan 31, 2006

• #8

great to hear Carlos got the seat..

 

F

frosty58

Joined Sep 2005

8K Posts | 1+

washington DC, USA

• Jan 31, 2006

• #9

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ooost @ Jan 31 2006, 11:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Mat Mladin seems to think that Dunlop tires are very capable and just need a solid rider in GPs to prove it.
he's wrong. dunlop need to do alot of work before their close bridgestone & especialy michelin.

 

R

richo

Joined Dec 2005

4K Posts | 0+

• Jan 31, 2006

• #10

But they are only on the crap bikes with inexperienced or just plain bad riders. Maybe Checa can prove somthing. Then again, maybe not.