3644401382255257
You arrogant ...., I bet your a ....... Aussie, well you would have to be, to name yourself after that ....... toolbag, anyway you think this forum is a select club and I should be grateful, I should grow some thicker skin? I know David Emmet, reading back as I have, I see what has happened, you are a family!!, you are a group who treat decent people who could add a lot to your forum like ...., you are stuck in the ....... dark ages, you are a bunch of keyboard worriers defending their beliefs and views despite the facts, you have some very smart people on here, shame when they are constantly shouted down and belittled by a few complete meat heads who every body seems to follow, so here's to not learning and being blinded by ego. ps Hawkdiver your a pretentious .... as well, but sadly with what I would say is an IQ of about 95 but don't feel to bad as that's 12 points up on Mick D, Tom you seem quite sharp, but your role is obvious, you defend the attacks but don't get involved at the dirty level yourself, a bit like a Nazi death camp guard, not turning on the taps but not looking anyone in the eye either, what a very sad place.
3644741382262383
I see how you think that, but your analogy makes it sound far more serious than it is. Also, I would add you are wrong in this case. I used to get very disgruntled with some of the banter on here, called some names etc, but came to realize that it's not nearly as serious as it looks when written. Smile as you type, smile as you read, say what you want. Everyone wins. If I wrote a transcript of the banter I have with my friends in the office it would sound much much worse than anything you read on here.
3644711382261126
Hoping you'll be like the USA in the recent America's Cup and make a stunning comeback though!
3641471382177355
Honda are not stupid.
3645191382277327
No, they're not. That's why I have a hard time believing their €1.2-million customer bike will be any closer than a half second to the full-factory machine. Unless, of course, Honda believe that this formula is the direction MotoGP is headed and are getting a head start—even then, I'd think they'd install a handicap to ensure the Repsols remain the fastest Hondas.
Perhaps, as you say, that gap could shrink once more data becomes available for the Showa kit, but won't teams running these bikes be given the data collected by Bautista over the past two years? If that's the case, surely there isn't a lot of room for improvement there.
3640931382153110
Good morning, I have read many comments on the rcv1000r, so I thought I would say a few words, despite many of the opinions stated on this and other forums, make no mistake, this bike is competitive.
This is a full RCV213 without a few specs, the lack of pneumatic valves is of no consequence when viewed with next years rules in mind, since the adoption of pneumatics valve spring technology has moved on a great deal, WSS engines can be thanked for this. The 20ltr fuel rule will stop any increase in the rev ceiling and reduce it at fast tracks, the 4ltr advantage will allow the production bike to produce as much horsepower as the factory bikes and for longer.
The Showa suspension supplied will be to the exact spec as Alvaro is using, and teams who purchase the bike will have full access to all data acquired this season, though a move to Ohlins is a drop in the ocean given the cost of the initial package.
The advantage gained by the seamless gearboxes of is very little in real terms when you look at how much time can be lost by a simple mistake in breaking or sliding.
This is a competitive machine even when compared directly to the full factory prototypes, they cost 1.2 million euros for a reason.
3645191382277327
No, they're not. That's why I have a hard time believing their €1.2-million customer bike will be any closer than a half second to the full-factory machine. Unless, of course, Honda believe that this formula is the direction MotoGP is headed and are getting a head start—even then, I'd think they'd install a handicap to ensure the Repsols remain the fastest Hondas.
Perhaps, as you say, that gap could shrink once more data becomes available for the Showa kit, but won't teams running these bikes be given the data collected by Bautista over the past two years? If that's the case, surely there isn't a lot of room for improvement there.
3645211382278201
0.8 seconds, while nothing to be sneezed at, is still a relatively large margin. Espagaro has occasionally had the ART within that range, and he's never finished better than 8th in a race. While it's easy to say the gap can come down with refinement to the package--I'd imagine Stoner did have some set-up and suspension data to work with, btw--the times Stoner set on the next year's factory bike can and will also get faster.
I can't see Hayden putting the bike on the podium next year, unless Yamaha and Ducati are hopelessly compromised by the 20L limit and Bradl and Bautista fail to finish. If the RCv1000r turns out to be better than Honda's satellite machinery, what exactly are Gresini and LCR being subsidised by Dorna/paying for? It would be embarrassing for Honda if Fausto handed back the satellite bike, pointed to Redding's and said: "We'll have two of those."
3642301382211536
Sorry Stiefel, that was rude of me, thank you and I think the two others for your welcome, I sat back and thought I will stay and play the game, until it becomes apparent who actually wants to talk bikes.
3645271382280767
Welcome to the board. Don't disappear. There's a lot of territoriality here and too often when someone smart comes along - there will those who try to run them off. I've been guilty of this myself. Stick around.
3645281382280965
Thank you Keshav, I may be way off here, but are you in New York,? and involved in Indian music?
3645231382278847
The bike is already much better than when tested by Stoner, it will be very much better by the first race of next season.
All of the factory teams are going to be compromised by the 20ltr rule, including Honda.
3645321382281350
Aren't there rumours to the effect that Honda can basically run with 20L right now?
3645341382281725
Yes, this is why it will be very good, it is already in satellite territory with the 20ltr rule, and this is how it has been developed. With and extra 4ltrs it will produce full power for longer.
3645391382282796
I was actually referring to the current 2013 factory bikes (hence Honda won't be compromised), but I'm not sure if you are. Re: development, I'm not really across all the technical stuff, but why would you develop a bike for 20L... and then add 4L? Shouldn't you just develop it as a 24L bike from the beginning, since the extra weight, etc. would make it handle differently. Of course, I imagine the only time a bike would be fully fuelled in any case would be during race simulations and testing performance for the early laps of a race.
If this bike is as good as you say it is, will Espargaro be kicking himself for buying out/getting out of his contract with Aspar? Any news on who will ride with Hayden? (Aspar is taking 2 bikes, correct?) With Redding on one, and Abraham on another, I imagine no.5 will soon be snapped up. Can PBM afford it?
3645221382278547
Hi Austin, firstly you are correct in your assumption, this what Honda are up to, as I stated earlier, KHI and Suzuki discussed doing this as a joint venture, just as they did with MX years ago.
When the production bike was tested it did not have the latest gen Showa's that Alvaro is now using, there is much more to come, but you can buy full A spec Ohlins for this bike and have access to the Repsol team data.
3646041382300348
Very interesting that this is the direction in development in Japan. Maybe this is the MSMA's grand plan to increase competition and grid sizes without giving up power.
I'd wondered about the availability of Öhlins on that bike. I'd expect that will be the route taken for most private teams, no?