Honda may sell RCV Replicas to privateers by 2014

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
What I don't get is the RC-166 red lined at 18k (19k some sources) in 1966. That was with steel springs and 60's metallurgy. Why is 16k the limit nowadays with steel springs? Was it the size of the 990's ?



I'll bet anything that the RPM limitations are strongly size dependent. The 166 valves were smaller than your pinky. Such small valves and springs can be tossed around with much less force.



There's a fundamental scaling law that affects all mechanical structures: If you double an item's linear dimensions, the item's cross section and strength will increase 4x, but its volume and mass will grow by a factor of 8. As things become larger, they grow comparatively less strong. That's why an ant can move a pebble 50+ times its mass but we tend to get squashed (like bugs!) when hit by the random runaway dump truck.

At any rate, tiny springs are much stiffer than large ones.
 
I'll bet anything that the RPM limitations are strongly size dependent. The 166 valves were smaller than your pinky. Such small valves and springs can be tossed around with much less force.



There's a fundamental scaling law that affects all mechanical structures: If you double an item's linear dimensions, the item's cross section and strength will increase 4x, but its volume and mass will grow by a factor of 8. As things become larger, they grow comparatively less strong. That's why an ant can move a pebble 50+ times its mass but we tend to get squashed (like bugs!) when hit by the random runaway dump truck.

At any rate, tiny springs are much stiffer than large ones.



Yeah, I like this answer.



I watched an interesting documentary as a kid explaining just that in relation to giant monsters in movies (king kong, godzilla), not being feasible. At the end it explained that if you were able to build a solid steel cube large enough, parts of it would shear off due to it's own weight.
 
I'll bet anything that the RPM limitations are strongly size dependent. The 166 valves were smaller than your pinky. Such small valves and springs can be tossed around with much less force.



There's a fundamental scaling law that affects all mechanical structures: If you double an item's linear dimensions, the item's cross section and strength will increase 4x, but its volume and mass will grow by a factor of 8. As things become larger, they grow comparatively less strong. That's why an ant can move a pebble 50+ times its mass but we tend to get squashed (like bugs!) when hit by the random runaway dump truck.

At any rate, tiny springs are much stiffer than large ones.



Exactly. It was a 6 cylinder 250cc bike. Look at the size of the piston:

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSaGKViAj48msfHlszET9Q961IGxuc7am8m_2aJzQRr9oyhThTi



When things are smaller and lighter, they don't have the inertia to cause issues as easily.
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top