This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Fukui resigns Honda CEO post

Joined Feb 2007
472 Posts | 0+
Nagoya, Japan
http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/cont...ws+%2B+analysis

It looks like Honda is still tanking, and Fukui has stepped aside. There's lots of talk about more cuts in the article, akin to what Toyota has done with their workforce.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE <div class='quotemain'>There may be more cuts ahead. In Japan, Honda is cutting 4,300 temporary workers by April. In the U.S., Fukui said recently the company may be forced to follow Toyota and introduce work-sharing and begin offering voluntary retirement deals.

I'd imagine it's a bit late to be pulling out, but you never know these days. It would be difficult for Honda to stomach laying off 4,300 temp workers and "forcing" retirement, yet still paying the big yen for some bikes to run around on a track.

I'm a bit worried.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ThePhorest @ Feb 23 2009, 05:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/cont...ws+%2B+analysis

It looks like Honda is still tanking, and Fukui has stepped aside. There's lots of talk about more cuts in the article, akin to what Toyota has done with their workforce.



I'd imagine it's a bit late to be pulling out, but you never know these days. It would be difficult for Honda to stomach laying off 4,300 temp workers and "forcing" retirement, yet still paying the big yen for some bikes to run around on a track.

I'm a bit worried.
i think where going to see major changes and cuts in all the teams by the end of the year. Sponsors are pulling out, banks wont lend money, people loosing there jobs. Sport and racing is a luxury and it nieve to think it wont be affected by a global recession.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (roger-m @ Feb 23 2009, 05:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>i think where going to see major changes and cuts in all the teams by the end of the year. Sponsors are pulling out, banks wont lend money, people loosing there jobs. Sport and racing is a luxury and it nieve to think it wont be affected by a global recession.
YEah it's going to be one hell of a yeah eh?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ROCKGOD01 @ Feb 23 2009, 05:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>YEah it's going to be one hell of a yeah eh?
If we're plunging towards deflation (which we appear to be), forget this year -it'll take a decade to recover. Everything will be aversely affected.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrabbiata1 @ Feb 23 2009, 09:46 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>If we're plunging towards deflation (which we appear to be), forget this year -it'll take a decade to recover. Everything will be aversely affected.

Why do you think the printing presses are running 24/7? We're going to expand the money supply by controlling the amount of paper in circulation.
<
If you think your government or any other government is going to allow prolonged deflation, you're fooling yourself.

Think about stockholder's equity. If you're a socialist, what better way to punish the rich than to dilute their shares without their consent?
<
I'm sure this will work out well for all of us.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Feb 23 2009, 05:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Why do you think the printing presses are running 24/7? We're going to expand the money supply by controlling the amount of paper in circulation.
<
If you think your government or any other government is going to allow prolonged deflation, you're fooling yourself.

Think about stockholder's equity. If you're a socialist, what better way to punish the rich than to dilute their shares without their consent?
<
I'm sure this will work out well for all of us.
What's up Lex? Suddenly you are putting blind faith in the very systems that have failed us and that you profess to loath. It seems you are advocating the sort of regulation you deplore.

Why are you so sure? Government measures can only go so far before they become ineffectual - it may be out of their control. This rests in the domain of the bankers...which hardly in itself inspires confidence.

No, realistically I don't think it will be allowed to happen, but then the events of the last decade were allowed to unfold by our myopic governments - and as we all know, they shouldn't have been allowed to happen. The key indicator of price pressures shows annual inflation tumbling to the lowest rate since 1960.

Here, inflation measured by the Retail Price Index extended recent sharp falls in January, and slid to an annual rate of just 0.1 per cent, down from 0.9 per cent in December, compared with a low of minus 0.5 per cent rate registered in March 1960. The cost of living measured by the RPI dropped by 1.3 per cent in January alone, driven down by falling mortgage interest bills due to the Bank of England’s past cuts in interest rates, in addition to further marked falls in fuel prices. Yet The Bank of England is still expected to push ahead with a further cut in interest rates next month from their present, historic low of 1 per cent.

Don't be such a condescending .... Lex. I'm fully aware of the incentive to "expand the money supply" - it's termed quantitative easing. It has been well documented that the Bank is expected to introduce this quantitative easing — creating money by which to purchase assets in an effort to inject cash flow and kick-start the economy.

With RPI inflation now barely registering as positive figure, it is inevitable that it will turn negative by March. A negative figure for RPI inflation, indicating year-on-year falls in average prices across the economy and in the cost of living, and even a negative figure on the CPI gauge will see the economy plummet further into the morass, experiencing a form of deflation. Opinion is divided as to whether this will be prolonged, do you have faith in the governments and bankers that you Lex so readily deride as necessarily having the competence to avert this threat?

The three big influences on inflation are set to go sharply into reverse next year, however, with fuel prices expected to stabilise or rise again, little scope left for further cuts in interest rates and the temporary VAT cut due to expire. In turn, those effects will all put upward pressure on inflation in 2010. In spite of this, the risk of deflation could multiply as the recession approaches depression, with scant demand from a cautious consumer market forcing businesses to slash prices, and unemployment to spiral meaning pay freezes, and an overall driving down of real wages. Delay buying, triggers further price cuts from struggling businesses, and the cash flow diminishes further. The Bank Of England's decision to pursue quantitative easing tactics that you refer to Lexicon, will be designed to prevent such a scenario becoming a reality. The Bank cationed in this month’s quarterly Inflation Report that Britain will teeter on the brink of deflation for much of the next three years.

I doubt that we are barreling headlong into an Irving Fischer type scenario of the 1930's, but the scenario that caged the Asian Tiger economies, and crippled Japan is certainly now looming in the west, and many would argue has already slain the Celtic Tiger.

As The Phorest quite correctly points out, under these circumstances, is paying big yen to run some bikes around a track high on HRC's list of priorities right now? Racing continues to be a potent shop window, but it remains expensive way to market your product during this era of ever diminishing returns. Fukui it would seem has definitely stepped aside, he won't be the last.
 
Banks creating money. Three words that describe the root of all economic problems. You might as well hand over law creation to the mafia it makes as much sense. As far as protectionism goes I am all for it. Screw China. The only people that care about "free trade" (the most Orwellian doublespeak ever devised) with China are the guys that removed all their manufacturing from North America and bribed lawmakers to give special duties to import back to N/A through GATT or whatever crooked trade agreement they could buy, yet lock up exporting to China from N/A with duties that are in the range or 45%. It is so corrupt it is laughable it should be 1500% from China. Whoever agreed to economic laws that favour a communist country over a free country are traitors, not traders.

The wise observant consumer should be learning from this time in history because the lesson is right in front of your face. Pay off all your debt and don't borrow a cent of bank created money regardless of the interest rate, it is a scam to enrich the bookkeeping aristocracy as ancient as time itself. The consumer is king now...and queen (ladies
<
).

Severely OT I admit... I hope Honda stays on or it is really the end of MotoGP. If Suzuki can do it then anyone can.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Arrabbiata1 @ Feb 24 2009, 04:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Don't be such a condescending .... Lex. I'm fully aware of the incentive to "expand the money supply" - it's termed quantitative easing. It has been well documented that the Bank is expected to introduce this quantitative easing — creating money by which to purchase assets in an effort to inject cash flow and kick-start the economy.

With RPI inflation now barely registering as positive figure, it is inevitable that it will turn negative by March. A negative figure for RPI inflation, indicating year-on-year falls in average prices across the economy and in the cost of living, and even a negative figure on the CPI gauge will see the economy plummet further into the morass, experiencing a form of deflation. Opinion is divided as to whether this will be prolonged, do you have faith in the governments and bankers that you Lex so readily deride as necessarily having the competence to avert this threat?


My bad. The U.S. government has just put me on the hook for another 1 trillion. Mainly because they are worried about the amount of money the Rockefeller's have.
<
Okay, not really, but that's the rhetoric we are forced to listen to.

No, I don't have any faith in the government, but I do have faith in the free market. If deflation sets in, I have complete faith that companies will continue to off workers at alarming rates and renegotiate wage contracts. This will cause a reduction in personal savings, an increase in government subsidies, and a reduction in goods supplied. In other words, I anticipate that aggregate demand will hold steady while supply drops. So cost-push and demand-pull simultaneously.

The real beauty, though, is the pork in the stimulus bill. Instead of spending governmental funds in a pattern that mimics aggregate demand, the government is going to throw money at their favorite pet projects. So we are going to be privileged with high structural and frictional unemployment and high worker transition costs.
<
Supply will never sufficiently recover from the excess administrative burden so we'll get relatively high unemployment and inflation! Yey, government.

Okay, I doubt it will get that far any time soon. We learned our lesson the first time the Phillips Curve shifted, right?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mylexicon @ Feb 24 2009, 04:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Okay, I doubt it will get that far any time soon. We learned our lesson the first time the Phillips Curve shifted, right?
Don't 'bank' on it Lex
<
 

Recent Discussions