<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TP70 @ Apr 12 2008, 01:29 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Why use the term conspiracy theory?
I guess that looking at the business decisions behind what happens on track is too difficult and it is just easier to banter about blah blah blah or call what I think is a worth while and very realistic topic a conspiracy theory. After all no corporate decisions influence the many millions of dollars that is spent to go racing.
Perhaps I should have started a thread on it. So maybe it is my mistake for trying to discuss in the wrong place.
Do U use that wingning argument every time you start a discussion?
You come with some rather controversial suggestions so if you want to discuss, expect some resistanse.
I strongly doubt Bridgestone has had any serious evaluation of Rossi loosing out to Lorenzo. What make you think so. Why waste time on an ulikely event (allthough it might look slightly more likely now)
You seem to come up with this based on Quatar but Bridgestone are far to serious to start a long evaluation based on one race. Besides their business plans for this year are probaly set in '07, not in April based on one race.
Now back to your first question, are Bridgestone developing tires for one rider. Well first of all, what rider are we talking about? You get offended if someone suggest you say they are developing for Rossi, and still Ducati are going backwards so to suggest anyone else seems strange.
Well, there is no big secret there. Bridgestone has technishinas at every team them work with. They all bring back feedback. That feedback are evaluated and turned into new tires. That's how it works for both Michelin and Bridgestone. There could be a question regarding who they listen to the most and regarding special requests requireing a complete new tire, but none of those can be translated into your suggestion. The answere is no! There is no way they would start developing spesific tires for spesific riders. They may trust one or two so much that they design a tire almost entirely beased on that riders input and request but it would be in the hope that it can gain most of the riders. Even if they did that they would most certainly continue to develop the exisiting line so I don't see the problem. I.e. Do you see any complications in the unlikely event that they would design a tire for one rider? I hope you are not suggesting that they don't develop other tires in parallell.
BTW. If you want straight replys come out with your opninis, not disguised questions and then complain about the replys you get.
Now Shut Up, the QP just started on tv