I always read opinions (and have often expressed mine) that the move to 800's were a joke for its intended purpose (SAFETY) given that today's bike are almost as fast (if not faster over a lap) than their 990 predecessors.
The main argument regarding the safety angle is that the 800's now take faster corner speeds to compensate for the lost of middle-high end power provided by the 990's (which enabled some riders to use the point and shoot style on taking a corner), and most (if not all) of the accidents occur at the corners rather than the straights.
However, had DORNA stuck with the 990's, how much faster would they have been compared to earlier versions? How would they compare to the time set by the 800's now?
How would the tire war have panned out?
Given the leap in electronics now, would the 990's still have been a better show than what we have today?
What do you think?
The main argument regarding the safety angle is that the 800's now take faster corner speeds to compensate for the lost of middle-high end power provided by the 990's (which enabled some riders to use the point and shoot style on taking a corner), and most (if not all) of the accidents occur at the corners rather than the straights.
However, had DORNA stuck with the 990's, how much faster would they have been compared to earlier versions? How would they compare to the time set by the 800's now?
How would the tire war have panned out?
Given the leap in electronics now, would the 990's still have been a better show than what we have today?
What do you think?