Carmelo Ezpeleta says MotoGP must change now

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
1,086
Dorna CEO Carmelo Ezpeleta says MotoGP must change now



By Michele Lostia and Pablo Elizalde

November 16th 2011



http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/96261







Dorna CEO Carmelo Ezpeleta believes MotoGP cannot continue in its current state, saying that change is needed right now and that an era is over.



The championship has struggled to fill the grid properly this year, with just 17 bikes competing regularly.

In contrast, the Moto2 championship has a 32-rider field, with 125cc also fielding over 30 bikes in each race.

Ezpeleta believes that the spectacle offered by MotoGP is unsatisfactory at the moment and that the sport must react immediately.



"I don't like the way things are going," Ezpeleta told Motosprint magazine. "I don't like MotoGP these days. We have a series where the Hondas go very quick, some others a bit less, and others even worse. This way there is little fighting, so the spectacle is unsatisfactory.



"This isn't just a technological challenge, it's also a sport and entertainment. I don't like this situation, so things won't go on this way for much longer."



Dorna has been pushing the new Claiming Rule Teams system, which will allow elements of modified production machinery, although riders like world champion Casey Stoner had threatened to walk out if the rules are steered towards production-based bikes.



Ezpeleta insisted, however, that the current system is simply not working, as it is making the sport too expensive.



"It's clear by now that the way the bikes are built doesn't work anymore," he said. "It's not suited to the world's economic situation anymore. If we carry on this way, with the teams lacking the budget to have the bike leased, in 2013 we'll only have two Hondas on the grid! This sport is not supposed to go this way.



"I've decided I won't help anymore, from a financial point of view, any team that gets MotoGP bikes leased. Dorna will only help teams that use CRTs. If we get to the situation where three constructors field six bikes in total, we'll carry on supporting and helping financially only the CRT teams. This way we'll manage to have the other 16 bikes we need."



He added: "It's paradoxical that Moto2, a once heavily-criticised series, is the one that offers the best spectacle at the moment, despite having, in theory, riders of a much lower level compared to MotoGP. We've reached the point where there are MotoGP riders that can't do anything because they don't have adequate technical means, because to race you need five millions...



"We've reached the point where private teams can't have MotoGP bikes to race anymore: Aspar's case, like many others too, is exemplary.



"It's ridiculous that a rider like [Moto2 champion Stefan] Bradl is asked four or five millions to race in MotoGP. How the hell is it possible that you need such an amount? How can we go on with the manufacturers asking for four millions for a leased bike, that is to use a bike that can't become the team's property? That's enough, this story has to end, and quickly too. This era is over.



"The constructors may say and act the way they want, but they can't change reality. This is reality: there's no more money, we need to spend less. We can't keep on watching anymore, we must act now."





---------------------------------------------------------------------



These are very strong words from Ezpeleta! It looks like he is very serious and will push forward with this.



What will the constructors say about this?

What will become of Motogp if they change it this way?

Will the constructors still remain in motogp?
 
Dang, he went ghetto.



I agree with some stuff, but i cant help to say, well this was partly by their own mismanagement of the series.



Oh, i might as well put it out there, and i know some of u reading his comments will perceive it as an attack on Stoner seeing it as a way to slow him down, and get Rossi competitive.



Oh, and did anybody notice this guy also mentioned Stoner's "threat" to walk away. Sorry to my Stoner fan friends (the few who havent rubbished me), but its news when the guy says things like that. And for better or worse, it will be discussed.
 
Not sure how I feel about the article at the minute.



I want to see the very best technology that the bike manufacturers can produce racing around a track and appreciate the skills that go into designing, developing and building an out and out prototype. I have to be honest, I do want to see the spectacle of close racing and a close championship ( not at the expense of doing all we can to slow the dominant rider or manufacturer down just because he or they are too good ).



But when we stop and think about the financial implications and expectations of a satellite team running a MotoGP effort for a season, is there any hope for the series as it currently stands ? If one of the best supported teams in racing Aspar, cannot find the necessary funds, what chance anyone else ?

Circa 5 million euros for a bike. Is that the starting point ? Do you then get charged for each engine that blows up, each fairing that get smashed ? I do not know the financial details, but its big money for a product that as a business will never be detailed in your balance sheet as an asset.



I don't think any of us want a dumbing down of the series, but unless we want 6 or 7 bikes on the grid what do we do ? I really am not expert enough to give a solution.



Do we think that the Bald Spaniard and Dorna are possibly making enough money to fund a prototype series and ensure the satellites get the help they need to run MotoGP bikes ? But they do not want to do this because it obviously hits their own pockets ?



Just not sure what I think about this at the minute
 
I agree with some stuff, but i cant help to say, well this was partly by their own mismanagement of the series

Dorna's, you mean? Wondering what examples you have in mind, keeping Dorna and the MSMA's decisions over the years separate, of course.
 
Not sure how I feel about the article at the minute.



I want to see the very best technology that the bike manufacturers can produce racing around a track and appreciate the skills that go into designing, developing and building an out and out prototype. I have to be honest, I do want to see the spectacle of close racing and a close championship ( not at the expense of doing all we can to slow the dominant rider or manufacturer down just because he or they are too good ).



But when we stop and think about the financial implications and expectations of a satellite team running a MotoGP effort for a season, is there any hope for the series as it currently stands ? If one of the best supported teams in racing Aspar, cannot find the necessary funds, what chance anyone else ?

Circa 5 million euros for a bike. Is that the starting point ? Do you then get charged for each engine that blows up, each fairing that get smashed ? I do not know the financial details, but its big money for a product that as a business will never be detailed in your balance sheet as an asset.



I don't think any of us want a dumbing down of the series, but unless we want 6 or 7 bikes on the grid what do we do ? I really am not expert enough to give a solution.



Do we think that the Bald Spaniard and Dorna are possibly making enough money to fund a prototype series and ensure the satellites get the help they need to run MotoGP bikes ? But they do not want to do this because it obviously hits their own pockets ?



Just not sure what I think about this at the minute





I,m also no expert and have little knowledge about this, but like you said if there are only 6 bikes, then there are not many choices left.

I dont think they are doing this to stop or slow down the domination of a specifiec rider or team, domination of a year or a period is nothing new in motogp, and the rule changes wont impact the riders that much, at the end the best riders will be in front.
 
"I don't like MotoGP these days. We have a series where the Hondas go very quick, some others a bit less, and others even worse.





Wow, did he feel this way in 08-09- 10, or does he just have a hard on for Honda.



Oh, i might as well put it out there, and i know some of u reading his comments will perceive it as an attack on Stoner seeing it as a way to slow him down, and get Rossi competitive.



Not an attack on Stoner, but getting Rossi back towards the front is playing heavy on Carmelo's emotions.
 
Dear Ezpeleta,



Quit whining, and go get some 1000cc prototype engines for your customers. If small manufacturers are willing to gamble their fortunes on 800cc prototypes, they will surely be willing to design, produce, homologate, and lease (set price) 1000cc MotoGP engines. If you use an RFP structure, you can control the amount of technology and provide variety.



Do the same thing for 800cc engines in a new Moto1 class (help all of the people who spent a mint on 800cc prototype engines). Repeat the process with 600cc engines in Moto2. Send the Moto3 children, and their Moto3 motorcycles, back home to the national series where they belong.
 
First i thought maybe this is a reaction to Stoner, but Ezpeleta never mentioned his name and his point is only about the constructors. As usual writers add some little bit to sell more.
 
Oh, and did anybody notice this guy also mentioned Stoner's "threat" to walk away. Sorry to my Stoner fan friends (the few who havent rubbished me), but its news when the guy says things like that. And for better or worse, it will be discussed.



Jums, I noticed that the journalist mentioned riders like WC Casey Stoner so I gather that the journalist may have interpreted that a number of riders will or are threatening to walk away (I wonder who those other riders may be)
<




Dorna has been pushing the new Claiming Rule Teams system, which will allow elements of modified production machinery, although riders like world champion Casey Stoner had threatened to walk out if the rules are steered towards production-based bikes.
 
Dorna's, you mean? Wondering what examples you have in mind, keeping Dorna and the MSMA's decisions over the years separate, of course.



Its by design i said "they", that is, the whole lot of them. It reminds me of people calling the financial melt down as a "crisis". Earthquakes & Hurricane damages are a "crisis". The .... men do when mismanaging a business, then go into survival mode when it predictably falls apart is not a " crisis" the way i see it. So i blame the whole lot dude.
 
Not an attack on Stoner, but getting Rossi back towards the front is playing heavy on Carmelo's emotions.



Oh, come on Pov. If ur gonna question the mans uterior motives and integrity, go all the way.
 
He's right and I'm glad he's finally stepped up and started doing something. The sad thing is, this is what Kenny Roberts was harping on about some six or seven years ago.



I'm saddened to see the beginning of the end of full-on prototypes, but if the choice if prototypes doing time trials or production derivative engines in prototype frames with a healthy grid, I'll go with the latter. The model just isn't sustainable anymore. As Will pointed out earlier, if Aspar can't find enough sponsorship for a Ducati, what hope is there for anyone?



What Lex is talking about is the direction I'd like to see them head. Whether or not any of the major factories or any engineering firms can be enticed into building a prototype engine is another matter.
 
They have to try something to curb costs, increase the grid size & put on a decent show. No question.

I love watching these guys ride, but even I wasn't that enthralled this year because battles up front were few & far between.

My guy won the title but it was not a season I will look back on and say it was a classic by any stretch of the imagination.

I doubt that is going to change much in 2012. Now Suzuki is gone too.

I just hope Dorna know what they are doing. Lets face it they don't have a good track record thus far.
 
They have to try something to curb costs, increase the grid size & put on a decent show. No question.

I love watching these guys ride, but even I wasn't that enthralled this year because battles up front were few & far between.

My guy won the title but it was not a season I will look back on and say it was a classic by any stretch of the imagination.

I doubt that is going to change much in 2012. Now Suzuki is gone too.

I just hope Dorna know what they are doing. Lets face it they don't have a good track record thus far.

Thats the bit that worrys me friz. We have all be saying for years that motogp in in trounle. First sign was when Team KR pulled out as i said in another thread. Trouble is everything the powers that be have tried to date have made things worse.
 
He's right and I'm glad he's finally stepped up and started doing something. The sad thing is, this is what Kenny Roberts was harping on about some six or seven years ago.



I'm saddened to see the beginning of the end of full-on prototypes, but if the choice if prototypes doing time trials or production derivative engines in prototype frames with a healthy grid, I'll go with the latter. The model just isn't sustainable anymore. As Will pointed out earlier, if Aspar can't find enough sponsorship for a Ducati, what hope is there for anyone?



What Lex is talking about is the direction I'd like to see them head. Whether or not any of the major factories or any engineering firms can be enticed into building a prototype engine is another matter.



Thanx for mentioning KRSR. If we wer to do a search, i'd bet we wer writing the same circa 07-08 regarding KRs frustration & advice for the health of the series. But what did that guy know... Now we are going with the very same thing he was trying to run--somebodys lump his frame. Oh, and again buddy, there is that "production" word; what made KR's bike arrangement so different to whats proposed now? Some factory guys make an engine at the 'factory', KR gets it, puts it in his chassis. A bit simplistic, but what makes an engineered case for 'production' any different than an engineered case for lease?
 
Thanx for mentioning KRSR. If we wer to do a search, i'd bet we wer writing the same circa 07-08 regarding KRs frustration & advice for the health of the series. But what did that guy know... Now we are going with the very same thing he was trying to run--somebodys lump his frame. Oh, and again buddy, there is that "production" word; what made KR's bike arrangement so different to whats proposed now? Some factory guys make an engine at the 'factory', KR gets it, puts it in his chassis. A bit simplistic, but what makes an engineered case for 'production' any different than an engineered case for lease?

What KR did in 2006 and 2007 is exactly what I'd like to see more of in this series. I don't want factory teams to go away, but I want to see more private efforts with their own chassis and a limited production engine. Is that better?
 
What KR did in 2006 and 2007 is exactly what I'd like to see more of in this series. I don't want factory teams to go away, but I want to see more private efforts with their own chassis and a limited production engine. Is that better?



It is. Thanx.
<
 

Recent Discussions

Back
Top