- Joined
- Jul 21, 2011
- Messages
- 1,467
- Location
- Dont Know
That's a slick with catastrophic failure, there is a difference. All I'm saying is it's more likely for catastrophic failure to occur on a wet (especially a soft wet) tire if the track isn't wet enough to prevent it from overheating.
The Michelin hard wet tires did not fail because they were better suited for the conditions today.
Chunking:
Extreme wearing (overheating):
Again, confusion because its Lorenzo. His quote after the race, explains when he came into the pits the "chunk" of the tire that was missing was not obvious to his crew because that part of the tire was facing down on the tarmac. The rest of the tire appeared perfect, not worn, not suffering stress blistering or dramatic wear or even looking like it needed changing, they actually wanted to send him straight back out on that drying track with the exact same tire. See the pic of the dramatically worn tire? It didn't look like that. Not a too soft tire on a drying track. An example of this would be the pic you posted from Misano.
Then while he was off on the second bike they rotated the tire and the penny dropped, oh thats why he came in. Just like Rossi's failure from indi in 2011, its a tire which is in good shape, not excessively worn, but just happens to have a chunk missing. Its a problem not related to wear. Its a problem for racing because it happens at random. Its a complete lottery. It can happen early in the race (Dovi), late in the race (Iannone), to the leader (same) or someone way behind the leader (Lorenzo), heavy braker (Dovi) light braker (Lorenzo). Its plain old dumb pot luck.