- Joined
- Aug 17, 2008
- Messages
- 1,086
Jane, my point doesnt hinge on Nics public opinion. Btw, ur same logic applys to Lorenzo. Like Rossiesky trying to hinge on contact while ignoring the block then taking Nicky wide. (While hes at it, ask him to put up a vid of VR's pass at MG corner, then tell me if this is reminicent of Elias' on Rossi, something Vale called "dangerous). Dont get stuck in isolation but look at the broad picture of VR's typical MO. Then u begin to see the tactic. My opinionis is its desperate and dirty tactic, perhaps ur opinion is thats standard racecraft. Perhaps u choose to call it shrewd or some other discription. I had a long conversation about it with CK (who is more in agreement with Rog but not quite as crazy as the crazies, u know who they are) and i got to thinking. He asked why dont others aliens use the tactic of lundging on inside then forcing other wide? This seems to b more typical of Rossi, at least in recent memory. He basically concluded, its becuz VR is willing to do anything to win and felt thats the key to success. If uv read my posts here, ive pretty much said same thing. Except ive charcterized that tactic as lacking integrity. I dont believe for one second that the other top riders simply dont posses the skill to lundge inside then put the other rider in the predicament of having to concede or risk crash. So why dont they employ this tactic more frequently (as i seen Rossi do). So im left with two options from my pondering. Its either balls or respect for a certain level of race etiquette. Notice how race etiquette has been dismissed by most of my antagonists. But is this a feasable & valid idea to consider? I contest that Casey Lorenzo and Nicky wer not punted becuz of their superior skill, Gibers was not so lucky. So ive concluded that these other three chose not to employ such counter tactics. Why? I speculate its bcuz of their understanding of what is acceptable race craft and perhaps the thought of running a guy wide leading to a possible crash is unconscionable. Its clear Rossi has a different understanding of race craft. According to CK, ends justify means in this game. Btw, Lorenzo has said, given the chance, he will race Rossi like Rossi. What does this mean? Well if the rider's opinion means anything, as is the premise of ur post, then take a closer look at what Rossi himself said about Elias at Turkey. He said Elias' crowding of him was "dangerous". Interesting, the man alludes to a certain unwritten rule of race craft, right? So why doesnt this apply to his moves? I suppose peeps can say, well thats becuz Elias was dangerous. Says who? Rossi and his fans? Elias thought it was fair. At Laguna Stoner felt Rossi was dangerous, Rossi thought it was fair. Same same as Lorenzo at Motegi. Well my opinion is his tactic at PI was dirty and dangerous. His fans think it was fair. Rossi, well of course he thinks it was goodfaith racecraft, but then again, he told us same thing about Gibers, Stones, & Lorenz, but called Elias dangerous, so that should giv u an idea of his perspective. Nicky, no complaints. So whos 'opinion' is right? And thats what its boiled down to, a diff of opinion. The peeps arguing me simply cant accept anybody's characterization of Rossi's race craft as anything other than sublime. They r the same peeps that say Gibs, Stones, r ....... and now JLo for complaining, but also will b quick to tag Elias as incorrect and dangerous in their respective incidents. Who is right when ther is an obvious inconsistency in the logic? Perhaps its just a difference of opinion. Perhaps...
(i was about done with the topic, and was just having fun now with the unreasonable crazies, but for u, i giv this reply. )
....., why do you keep repeating, Rossi and his fans?
Are you blind to see more than 10 other people who are Hayden's and Stoner's fans, are saying the same what Rossi fans said in this case. you just like to bs.