- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
- Messages
- 3,210
- Location
- Outback Steakhouse
Actually I'm beginning to think it's you and Jum that need to get a room.
Haha good Kesh
Actually I'm beginning to think it's you and Jum that need to get a room.
Think MotoChick is more your style Lotus
Eww. Jersey Guido. Sparrow is more my type
Eww. Jersey Guido. Sparrow is more my type
Please.
The song Rock You Like a Hurricane was written about me.
Carmelo knows what will make Dorna a crapload of money over the next few years and you don't kill your golden goose off...if anything you want to protect him at his ripe old age, and do everything to assure that he has a very real chance to be competitive before he quits. If what he did in 2008 regarding Michelin v. Bridgestone, why anyone would think he wouldn't be in favor of stacking the deck for VR in 2016 and beyond, is ludicrous.
I've never experienced internal combustion which very nearly led to external embarrassment so much in my life.....oh my god.
But I'll add, guess who got bailed out of Ducati, and guess WHO orchestrated (putting it euphemistically ) the deal?
Think MotoChick is more your style Lotus
.... you guys! I'm not a pawn! .... punches all around.
You'll have to have a pretty long reach around to get mine...
Ok, so then you were agreeing with my conspiracy theory, ah sorry, I thought otherwise. Ha!
I don't believe there is any tyre conspiracy this year. I am not entirely convinced there never has been a tyre conspiracy of any kind, or that Dorna would never attempt a conspiracy.I thought this should be migrated to this thread.
"Rossi's" tires (harder construction) happened to be also "Stoner's" tires... so much for the conspiracy.
"All this labeling is just according to riders' stated preferences; if you look at actual results, it's more of a mixed bag because it's not at all assured that a rider will win on "his" preferred tires. They might give a slight better feeling, but results vary.
Lorenzo so far has been perhaps the most consistent on "his" tires (softer construction ensuring more edge grip, better suited to his corner speed style) scoring most of his wins on those; had it been Rossi doing the same, we can imagine the conspiracy conjectures from Jum & C...
Moreover Bridgestone decides which tires to bring to each track months in advance, and there are always solid technical arguments for their choice, based on the track characteristics. Which pretty much dictate the tires to be used.
Conspiracy theorists will then have to move their conjectures back at the track selection level, and declare that Dorna selects tracks to "design" a championship for a certan rider? I woildn't be surprised "
J4rno
I don't believe there is any tyre conspiracy this year. I am not entirely convinced there never has been a tyre conspiracy of any kind, or that Dorna would never attempt a conspiracy.
I'll stretch armstrong my arm around the world...don't worry.
If Dorna/Michelin were to get the ....... basics of tyre manufacture right and produce a product which does not spit off almost every factory rider like they did in their last test, how will they develop over time? Historical evidence suggests they will inevitably become biased in some regard. If Dorna indeed holds the development reigns, and their goal is financial gains by promoting one 'star' rider rather than promoting a 'balance' for the show a-la WSBK, I cannot see them throwing too many eggs in the diminishing-returns column which is Valentino Rossi. Few wise businesses would opt for such short-term potential when a much longer-term option (MM... J-Lo) is available.
Rossi has been leading the championship, standing on the podium when he's not won, may end up being the reining champion when Michelin enter the series, and all the Devine status that a 10th title would bestow; but Kesh and Mick want to convince us Michelin are like...Valentino who? Uhm got it. Hey boys, I have some beach property in Kansas I'd like to sell you. Its a great deal!The Doctor is not a diminishing returns column at the moment.
He only becomes a diminishing return when there are no major records left to break.
Rossi has been leading the championship, standing on the podium when he's not won, may end up being the reining champion when Michelin enter the series, and all the Devine status that a 10th title would bestow; but Kesh and Mick want to convince us Michelin are like...Valentino who? Uhm got it. Hey boys, I have some beach property in Kansas I'd like to sell you. Its a great deal!
In respect of Michelin, I think conspiracy is the wrong word. It was pretty much established that comparative bespoke advantage was afforded to certain riders who dined at Clermont Ferrand, or those with the skill to exploit the softer compound afforded by the 16.5 rear. McCoy had his advantage cruelly stripped from him imo when this became the weapon of choice - although most never mastered it to the same devastating effect.
The Doctor is not a diminishing returns column at the moment.
He only becomes a diminishing return when there are no major records left to break.
Rossi became a Bridgestone man in nano-second (the first who les the way no less) after years of being the favored son at Michelin. I'm sure he can find it in his heart to become a Michelin man once again. Its not like he is adverse to throwing people under the bus, just ask Burgess.One thing is for sure, since 2008 Valentino Rossi is not at all a Michelin man. Just as since 2003 he's quite the opposite of being a Honda man.
On the contrary, he has a more to lose than others if Michelin (as it seems) brings in a weaker front tire, a strong front being so important for his riding style.
Rossi became a Bridgestone man in nano-second (the first who les the way no less) after years of being the favored son at Michelin. I'm sure he can find it in his heart to become a Michelin man once again. Its not like he is adverse to throwing people under the bus, just ask Burgess.
I'm still laughing at Kesh's reply about Michelin overlooking Rossi to look to the future. I have no response.