- Joined
- Jun 18, 2006
- Messages
- 1,832
- Location
- south wales UK
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jumkie @ Jun 26 2008, 06:47 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Actually, I'm trying a new approach. I realize 99.999999999% of everything he says is just simply trolling. I've tagged him as much. But I want to see if there is a shred of reason and an ability to articulate behind that brain of Pinky. So in this case, yes, I actually would like to know why he thinks Spies, after missing two practices; on an already short schedule is "chicken ...." for not rushing into a very dangerous and technically demanding sport. I'm wondering if he can debate and carry a point with reasonable and logical articulation. (Am I crazy? --maybe) I suppose I just want to give him a chance to turn from his two-line dig quips and carry an intelligent conversation.
pinky is exactly like the cartoon pinky and the brain the only thing is that brain is missing so thats all you get is totall nonsense.
he cant undertand what people are trying to say and we cant understand what the hell he goes onabout, its pinky that needs to change his approach.
sometimes you just want a civil conversation here and discuss things and try to understand the technical side of things but usually barry and pinky just wade in, dont read your posts and give a nobheaded reply.
pinky is exactly like the cartoon pinky and the brain the only thing is that brain is missing so thats all you get is totall nonsense.
he cant undertand what people are trying to say and we cant understand what the hell he goes onabout, its pinky that needs to change his approach.
sometimes you just want a civil conversation here and discuss things and try to understand the technical side of things but usually barry and pinky just wade in, dont read your posts and give a nobheaded reply.