<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (johnny @ Oct 7 2008, 11:18 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><div class='quotemain'>Your entitled to your opinion but I totally disagree with you, but then you talk more ........ about conspiracies and so on that I dont think you watch the sport for the same reasons as I do
WSS has some fine riders and is great to watch. WSS bikes are by no means simple bikes to ride sure easier than a WSBK and Motogp beast, but the battles are no less vicious and probably more aggressive. In the majority of peoples eyes WSS is also a stepping stone to WSBK and Motogp
Have you ever ridden a 600cc sports fast on track, they are great fun
Motogp has only... I dont know 4 mabey 6 riders that are really in for a chance of taking the WC title what dose that say about Motogp in realtion to WSS using your method of assessment?
Anytime I use hyperbole, don't take it too seriously.
WSS is not a junkyard or a sewage plant or a landfill, but I do think Ant is better than WSS.
My conspiracies rarely have any hyperbole unless I'm having a dig at someone. They aren't difficult to understand either. Ezy wanted to reduce cornering speeds and get Vale onto tires built for someone of his stature. He didn't want to kick Michelin out and he didn't want them to leave at the end of 2007.
You'd have to be a fool to think that Ezy, the tire manufacturers, and the bike manufacturers weren't going to have at least 1 go at a controlled tire with multiple manufacturers.
I think the experiment was relatively successful. 4 different winners in 4 races. The races weren't close and Stoner was not getting a fair shake, but it wasn't too bad. If Michelin had made substantial improvement at Laguna and Brno we might not be having this control tire discussion.