Ambition Over Talent --- what was it??

MotoGP Forum

Help Support MotoGP Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
fresh from Motogp.com:



"Following the collision between Rossi and Stoner during the MotoGP race of the Spanish Grand Prix on 3 April in Jerez, the Race Direction has decided to organize a hearing with the Clerk of the Course and the Chief Marshal in order to review the incident and to hear the explanation of the officials in charge"



when the marshals gave Rossi a 'push' they actually gave him a shift to the right trajectory it wasnt a push START they could

obviously hear that the engine was still running, for some reason they thought the same for stoner.. which brings me

to my question-- why on earth did he push the kill switch???
 
fresh from Motogp.com:



"Following the collision between Rossi and Stoner during the MotoGP race of the Spanish Grand Prix on 3 April in Jerez, the Race Direction has decided to organize a hearing with the Clerk of the Course and the Chief Marshal in order to review the incident and to hear the explanation of the officials in charge"



when the marshals gave Rossi a 'push' they actually gave him a shift to the right trajectory it wasnt a push START they could

obviously hear that the engine was still running, for some reason they thought the same for stoner.. which brings me

to my question-- why on earth did he push the kill switch???

To save the engine obviously.Maybe he didn't know how the accident would pan out or affect the engine.
 
-- why on earth did he push the kill switch???



You are joking aren't you ?
<
<




Don't know if you have ever had your bike on top of some other guy ....... I have.



The first thought is F#%K is the pipe on him!!?? thne SH%t! his foots in the chain!!





I believe its pretty standard practice to kill the bike if its on top of someone
<
Even if its Rossi
<
<
<






WHat I guess is frustration is when that trapped guy then gets up ..... has his bike still running ........ had his bike pinted in the right direction for him ..... then took off again
<
<
<
 
ok then, Rossi is claiming he wasnt going for a pass, BUT if you look repeatedly at the rewind we will clearly notice

that the second he gets on the brakes he goes for an inside line to an attacking position



now who knows maybe Rossi's statement is just for cover up, although I don't think

hes trying to go there, hes kind of an honest person.
 
I think Aussies are are a bunch of ......' ..... whiners!





WTF??? This guy is like the 10th new moron to show up on PS since Jerez ended.

What happened last week? Did the Official Teenybopper site for Pin-Heads crash?

It's starting to look like someone here who hates Stoner is just making up new

avatars daily for the purposes of "evening up the odds" since public opinion started

to turn against Rossi. It's like we're having an infestation of eight-year-olds here.

Now there's a Neo and a Nino and both are imbeciles.
 
WTF??? This guy is like the 10th new moron to show up on PS since Jerez ended.

What happened last week? Did the Official Teenybopper site for Pin-Heads crash?

It's starting to look like someone here who hates Stoner is just making up new

avatars daily for the purposes of "evening up the odds" since public opinion started

to turn against Rossi. It's like we're having an infestation of eight-year-olds here.

Now there's a Neo and a Nino and both are imbeciles.





How many computers does Reg. have access too ?
<
<
<
 
You are joking aren't you ?
<
<




Don't know if you have ever had your bike on top of some other guy ....... I have.



The first thought is F#%K is the pipe on him!!?? thne SH%t! his foots in the chain!!





I believe its pretty standard practice to kill the bike if its on top of someone
<
Even if its Rossi
<
<
<






WHat I guess is frustration is when that trapped guy then gets up ..... has his bike still running ........ had his bike pinted in the right direction for him ..... then took off again
<
<
<







But... his bike was not over Vale's leg. Actually Rossi's leg was under his own Ducati and the rest of his body was well visible. Only the front end of the Honda was resting on the Duck. Stoner got on his feet immediately and could see that very well. I think he killed the engine without thinking really, as since the new engine rule all riders have been instructed to do so after a crash.
huh.gif
 
But... his bike was not over Vale's leg. Actually Rossi's leg was under his own Ducati and the rest of his body was well visible. Only the front end of the Honda was resting on the Duck. Stoner got on his feet immediately and could see that very well. I think he killed the engine without thinking really, as since the new engine rule all riders have been instructed to do so after a crash.
huh.gif



Is it against the regulations to have some form of electronic starter installed on the bikes for this very reason....it seems this engine rule has had an unintended consequence as has been demonstrated in this instance.
 
exactly what I was thinking .... the second he looked over even before he got up, he

could see as clear as crystal that there was no danger to Rossi from a contact with the Honda





and for a different matter---- Im death curious to know what would have gone down if both Rossi

and Casey make it back on track at the same time
<
......a scary thought really
 
THIS.



How long before someone puts Casey's infamous words on a tshirt?
<

I already sent it to the shop 2 days ago. If i go to Silverstone, i will wear it. And i will provide Chops with one as well. No BS.





Btw, Bikee4, welcome back.
 
Thanks for the gpone interview. I believe Valentino is speaking the truth as it supports my theory that we wanted to get to the front as soon as possible since it was quite clear he would be at a disadvantage on the Ducati as the track dried. While the track was wet, his Ducati would go as fast as he was willing to risk it. I think he was attempting to pass, but not to crash and take Stoner with him. His apology to Stoner was sincere. There was no need for him to try to track Stoner down after the race. Stoner on the other hand, could have been more gracious and less sarcastic. Although, I fully understand how angry anyone would be. I'd respect him more, if he had thrown a punch or two.
 
did anyone get a hold of this???



after Rossi got back on track and stoner left standing trackside he was applauding Rossi(in contempt I would imagine) as Rossi

was raising his hand as in to say Im sorry.



11736:crash_stoner_rossi003_original.jpg]
 

Attachments

  • crash_stoner_rossi003_original.jpg
    crash_stoner_rossi003_original.jpg
    278.8 KB
Thanks for the gpone interview. I believe Valentino is speaking the truth as it supports my theory that we wanted to get to the front as soon as possible since it was quite clear he would be at a disadvantage on the Ducati as the track dried. While the track was wet, his Ducati would go as fast as he was willing to risk it. I think he was attempting to pass, but not to crash and take Stoner with him. His apology to Stoner was sincere. There was no need for him to try to track Stoner down after the race. Stoner on the other hand, could have been more gracious and less sarcastic. Although, I fully understand how angry anyone would be. I'd respect him more, if he had thrown a punch or two.



Why not make it three for three and tell us you believe in the tooth fairy? I'll be she'll support your theories too.
 

Attachments

  • images.jpg
    images.jpg
    7.8 KB
did anyone get a hold of this???



after Rossi got back on track and stoner left standing trackside he was applauding Rossi(in contempt I would imagine) as Rossi

was raising his hand as in to say Im sorry.

Uhm. Late to the party? No.
<






.
<
 

Recent Discussions

Recent Discussions

Back
Top