Joined Apr 2024
3 Posts | 2+
Cypress, Texas, USA
I'm new here, but I want to see if people agree with my opinion; The only reason Bagnaia won two titles is he had no rivals. I think Bagania never actually did anything to win except he was left standing there when his minor rivals fell all around him, so he was handed the title, by accidental default. Twice. NOW, if he just stays the same as he was, everyone else will leave him in the dust as they progress over and past him. Because NOW, for the first time (Surprise, Pecco!), He has at least three rivals: 1) Pedro Acosta is new and awesome, 2) Jorge Martin is more mature and noticeably improved, and 3) Marc Marquez was absent for 4 years but now he's back with a good bike. Bagnaia can't even match these guys, in my opinion. Then there's Vinales, Binder, others are all improving while Pecco stays the same, etc. See what I mean?
Who agrees with me?
Who agrees with me?
Last edited: